Season 5: Retro Governance Participation Rewards

Governance Design 📐 Metagovernance
,
12

Hi @op_julian @lavande,

First of all, big thanks to the Optimism Foundation team for your relentless efforts and for spearheading initiatives that strengthen and elevate our collective governance participation.

We’d like to contribute some insights. My team, behind the OP governance analytics dashboard, has been closely monitoring governance activities and voting participation. Our data shows that there are discrepancies in the list of eligible addresses:

Should be eligible for Criteria 1: Participated in Season 5

  1. 0x406b607644c5d7bfda95963201e45a4c6ab1c159
    (voted on 9/12 proposals = 75% of Season 5 proposals)

  2. 0x11cf2f033b079fbb195425bfcb7d5dac4db2d752
    (voted on 9/12 proposals = 75% of Season 5 proposals)

Should be eligible for Criteria 2: Participated in Reflection Period

  1. 0x45a10f35befa4ab841c77860204b133118b7ccae
    (voted on 16/16 proposals = 100% of Reflection Period Proposals)

Should not be eligible for Criteria 2: Participated in Reflection Period

  1. 0x48a63097e1ac123b1f5a8bbffafa4afa8192fab0 (voted on 8/16 proposals = 50% of Reflection Period Proposals)

**These lists are based on voting power, including both delegation and partial delegation snapshot as of 5/9/24. Under the criteria below:

  1. Participated in Season 5

Top 100 delegate with >70% voting participation in Season 5

  • 12 proposals, Jan 25 - April 18)
  1. Participated in Reflection Period

Top 100 delegate with > 70% voting participation during Special Voting Cycle #16a, #16b, AND #16c

  • 16a, (7 proposals, ended Oct 26)
  • 16b, (7 proposals, ended Nov 16)
  • 16c, (2 proposals, ended Dec 7)

**Note that there was one optimistic approval proposal that we also count towards Season 5 participation. However, if we remove this, both delegates on our list would still be eligible for the reward as they would have voted on 8/11 proposals (72.7%).

You can check our full list of all eligible delegates here

Our aim is to contribute to greater transparency for initiatives like these. We’re here to collaborate, enhance how we operate, and ensure everyone has access to the information they need.

Moreover, it would be great to hear from the foundation regarding this matter to clarify and perhaps validate the data. A cooperative and collective dialogue could further refine our processes and reinforce accuracy and transparency moving forward.

Let me know if there are any updates from the data team. It would be great if we could spot any discrepancies. I want to ensure all deserving delegates are duly recognized.

4 Likes