Grants Council Elections
Grants Council Reviewers will be elected by the Token House in Special Voting Cycle #16b, which runs from Nov 2nd - Nov 15th.
Those that would like to nominate themselves for these roles must fill out the below template and post here by November 1st at 19:00 GMT.
There is no minimum voting power requirement to be a Reviewer.
Grants Council Self-Nomination Template
Please keep your answers as concise as possible while conveying all relevant information.
Council sub-committee: (if applicable)
If you are a delegate, please provide the link to your delegate commitment:
If you are a delegate, please indicate what % of votable supply is delegated to you: (voting power can be referenced here)
If you are a delegate, please indicate your voting participation rate in OP governance to date: (You may link to your profile on Karma, if applicable. If not, you can divide the number of Optimism votes under your Snapshot profile by 87, which is the number of Token House votes through Season 2, and add all possible votes from Agora.)
Please link to your voting history and any voting rationale you’ve shared: (You may link to your Snapshot and/or Agora profile for voting history. You may link to your delegate communication thread, or any other medium you use to communicate with your delegators, to share your voting rationale.)
Please outline any other contributions to the Optimism ecosystem to date:
Do you have a technical background? If so, please elaborate:
Have you previously served on a Token House Council or committee? If so, please specify which:
Please demonstrate any experience you believe is relevant to this role:
Please demonstrate expertise relevant to your Council sub-committee: (if applicable)
Please describe your philosophy on what makes a good Governance Fund grant:
What types of Mission Requests do you think will help achieve the Season 5 Intents?
Please disclose any anticipated conflicts of interest:
Please verify that you agree to abide by the Code of Conduct:
Please verify that you understand KYC will be required to receive Council rewards at the end of Season 5:
Please verify that you are able to commit ~20 hours / week to reviewing grant applications and other Council operations:
What Does This Mean for Delegates?
Reviewers will be elected via approval voting in Special Voting Cycle #16b. Approval voting is a mechanism that allows each delegate to vote for as many nominees as they choose with equal voting power. The nominees with the highest percentage of approval votes will be elected to the Council. Please note this policy in the Code of Conduct:
In the case of approval/ranked choice elections, delegates may vote for themselves, so long as they also cast votes for the remaining elected positions.
Example: I can vote for my own candidacy on the Growth Experiments committee, so long as I also cast 4 additional votes (a total of 5 votes, as there are 5 open positions on the sub-committee.)
Please note the above outlined voting mechanism is subject to change depending on Council structure and number of eligible candidates.
Token House Code of Conduct Council Elections
Token House Code of Conduct Members will be elected by the Token House in Special Voting Cycle #16b, which runs from November 2nd - November 15th.
Those that would like to nominate themselves for these roles must fill out the below template and post here by November 1st at 19:00 GMT.
There is no minimum voting power requirement to be a Member but:
- Token House Code of Conduct Council members cannot be badgeholders
- Token House Code of Conduct Council members must have completed GravityDAO’s conflict resolution training (online or live) by the start of Season 5
Please note: Citizens’ House Code of Conduct elections will take place following a similar process in Voting Cycle #18 (during Season 5.)
Token House Council Self-Nomination Template
Please keep your answers as concise as possible while conveying all relevant information.
If you are a delegate, please provide the link to your delegate commitment:
If you are a delegate, please indicate what % of votable supply is delegated to you: (voting power can be referenced here)
If you are a delegate, please indicate your voting participation rate in OP governance to date: (You may link to your profile on Karma, if applicable. If not, you can divide the number of Optimism votes under your Snapshot profile by 87, which is the number of Token House votes through Season 2, and add all possible votes from Agora.)
Please link to your voting history and any voting rationale you’ve shared: (You may link to your Snapshot and/or Agora profile for voting history. You may link to your delegate communication thread, or any other medium you use to communicate with your delegators, to share your voting rationale.)
Please outline any other contributions to the Optimism ecosystem to date:
Have you attended GravityDAO’s conflict resolution training?:
If so, what was the most impactful learning you took away from this training?:
Please demonstrate any experience you believe is relevant to this role:
Have you previously served on a Token House Council or committee? If so, please specify which:
Please disclose any anticipated conflicts of interest:
Please verify that you agree to abide by the Code of Conduct:
Please verify that you understand KYC will be required to receive Council rewards at the end of Season 5:
Please verify that you are able to commit ~5 hours / week, on average, to processing Code of Conduct violations and reporting enforcement actions to the community:
What Does This Mean for Delegates?
Token House Code of Conduct Council Members will be elected via approval voting in Special Voting Cycle #16b. Approval voting is a mechanism that allows each delegate to vote for as many nominees as they choose with equal voting power. The nominees with the highest percentage of approval votes will be elected to the Council. Please note this policy in the Code of Conduct:
In the case of approval/ranked choice elections, delegates may vote for themselves, so long as they also cast votes for the remaining elected positions.
Example: I can vote for my own candidacy on the Growth Experiments committee, so long as I also cast 4 additional votes (a total of 5 votes, as there are 5 open positions on the sub-committee.)
Please note the above outlined voting mechanism is subject to change depending on Council structure and number of eligible candidates.