If the Grants Council is renewed in Special Voting Cycle #12a, Reviewers will be elected by the Token House in Special Voting Cycle #12b, which runs from May 18th - May 31st.
Those that would like to nominate themselves for these roles must fill out the below template and post here by May 17th at 19:00 GMT.
There is no minimum voting power requirement to be a Reviewer.
Please keep your answers as concise as possible while conveying all relevant information.
Council sub-committee: (if applicable)
If you are a delegate, please provide the link to your delegate commitment:
If you are a delegate, please indicate what % of votable supply is delegated to you: (voting power can be referenced here)
If you are a delegate, please indicate your voting participation rate in OP governance to date: (You may link to your profile on Karma, if applicable. If not, you can divide the number of Optimism votes under your Snapshot profile by 87, which is the number of Token House votes through Season 2, and add a possible 2 votes from Agora.)
Please link to your voting history and any voting rationale you’ve shared: (You may link to your Snapshot profile for voting history. You may link to your delegate communication thread, or any other medium you use to communicate with your delegators, to share your voting rationale.)
Please outline any other contributions to the Optimism ecosystem to date:
Do you have a technical background? If so, please elaborate:
Have you previously served on a Token House Council or committee? If so, please specify which:
Please demonstrate any experience you believe is relevant to this role:
Please demonstrate expertise relevant to your Council sub-committee: (if applicable)
Please describe your philosophy on what makes a good Governance Fund grant:
What types of grant applications do you think will help achieve Intent #2?
Please disclose any anticipated conflicts of interest:
Please verify that you agree to abide by the Code of Conduct: Yes
Please verify that you understand KYC will be required to receive Council rewards at the end of Season 4: Yes
Please verify that you are able to commit ~20 hours / week to reviewing grant applications and other Council operations: Yes
If the Grants Council is renewed in Special Voting Cycle #12a, Reviewers will be elected via approval voting in Special Voting Cycle #12b. Approval voting is a mechanism that allows each delegate to vote for as many nominees as they choose with equal voting power. The nominees with the highest percentage of approval votes will be elected to the Council. Please note this policy in the Code of Conduct:
In the case of approval/ranked choice votes, delegates may vote for themselves, so long as they also cast votes for the remaining elected positions.
Example: I can vote for my own candidacy on the Growth Experiments committee, so long as I also cast 4 additional votes (a total of 5 votes, as there are 5 open positions on the sub-committee.)
Please note the above outlined voting mechanism is subject to change depending on Council structure and number of eligible candidates.