Proposal: Intent #1, 1M OP
Vote: 1A, 1C, 1E
Rationale:
Proposal 1A: This is a strong governance team and we are happy to support their work
Proposal 1C: Having 24 hour technical support for Optimism would be beneficial to users and could help people new to blockchain become familiar
Proposal 1E: UI and UX is a major problem in crypto and we support this alliance trying to future proof it for Optimism
Proposal: Intent #3, 1M OP
Vote: 3I Thank Optimism
Rationale: After speaking with the Thrive coin team we believe this proposal will help spread optimistic awareness.
Proposal: Intent #4, 3M OP
Vote: 4B, 4M
Rationale:
Proposal 4B: Michael has been a dedicated member of the DAO and knows the ins and outs of the collective. This podcast has a lower budget and we think it would be a great initiative.
Proposal 4M: This is a very cool initiative that could bring unique insights to governance data and help the DAO learn and grow.
Proposal: Intent 2 Budget Proposal 2
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support the extra funding from the other intents being used to fund grants as this public funding will help improve the Optimism ecosystem
Proposal: Ratify Developer Advisory Board Members
Vote: Yes
Rationale: StableLab believes a developer advisory board will help grow the ecosystem. The budget appears reasonable and the members seem to be knowledgeable on the subject
Proposal: Developer Advisory Board Budget
Vote: Yes
Rationale: StableLab believes a developer advisory board will help grow the ecosystem. The budget appears reasonable for the first season of this program
Proposal: Grants Council Operating Budget
Vote: Yes
Rationale: The grants council has proven to be a success in the past. This budget makes sense as a way to add improvements to the program while also maintaining the parts that are already working.
Proposal: Security Council: Vote #1
Vote: Yes
Rationale: While we would eventually like to see full decentrilization and not rely on individuals controlling a multisig, we understand that for now, this is the best choice for Optimism in order to provide security and efficiency.
Proposal: Code of Conduct Council Budget
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We believe Code of Conduct disputes are better handled by a council and not delegates. Therefor we are happy to fund a council to deal with code of conduct violations and this budget seems reasonable for the role.
Proposal: Code of Conduct Violation: Carlos Melgar
Vote: Abstain
Rationale: StableLab does not feel we have the necessary info to make an informed decision on the matter. Given such we have decided to abstain. We support that these decisions will be made by a council in the future.
Proposal: Anticapture Commission
Vote: Yes
Rationale: While StableLab believes the anti-capture commission should have both more voting power and a more efficient way of using this voting power, we believe this is a good first iteration of the initiative. We look forward to serving on the commission as well as providing feedback after the season to hopefully form an improved anti-capture commission for season 6.