StableLab - Delegate Communication Thread

🏛 Token House Governance Delegate Updates
21

Proposal: Intent #1, 1M OP

Vote: 1A, 1C, 1E

Rationale:

Proposal 1A: This is a strong governance team and we are happy to support their work

Proposal 1C: Having 24 hour technical support for Optimism would be beneficial to users and could help people new to blockchain become familiar

Proposal 1E: UI and UX is a major problem in crypto and we support this alliance trying to future proof it for Optimism

Proposal: Intent #3, 1M OP

Vote: 3I Thank Optimism

Rationale: After speaking with the Thrive coin team we believe this proposal will help spread optimistic awareness.

Proposal: Intent #4, 3M OP

Vote: 4B, 4M

Rationale:

Proposal 4B: Michael has been a dedicated member of the DAO and knows the ins and outs of the collective. This podcast has a lower budget and we think it would be a great initiative.

Proposal 4M: This is a very cool initiative that could bring unique insights to governance data and help the DAO learn and grow.

Proposal: Intent 2 Budget Proposal 2

Vote: Yes

Rationale: We support the extra funding from the other intents being used to fund grants as this public funding will help improve the Optimism ecosystem

Proposal: Ratify Developer Advisory Board Members

Vote: Yes

Rationale: StableLab believes a developer advisory board will help grow the ecosystem. The budget appears reasonable and the members seem to be knowledgeable on the subject

Proposal: Developer Advisory Board Budget

Vote: Yes

Rationale: StableLab believes a developer advisory board will help grow the ecosystem. The budget appears reasonable for the first season of this program

Proposal: Grants Council Operating Budget

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The grants council has proven to be a success in the past. This budget makes sense as a way to add improvements to the program while also maintaining the parts that are already working.

Proposal: Security Council: Vote #1

Vote: Yes

Rationale: While we would eventually like to see full decentrilization and not rely on individuals controlling a multisig, we understand that for now, this is the best choice for Optimism in order to provide security and efficiency.

Proposal: Code of Conduct Council Budget

Vote: Yes

Rationale: We believe Code of Conduct disputes are better handled by a council and not delegates. Therefor we are happy to fund a council to deal with code of conduct violations and this budget seems reasonable for the role.

Proposal: Code of Conduct Violation: Carlos Melgar

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: StableLab does not feel we have the necessary info to make an informed decision on the matter. Given such we have decided to abstain. We support that these decisions will be made by a council in the future.

Proposal: Anticapture Commission

Vote: Yes

Rationale: While StableLab believes the anti-capture commission should have both more voting power and a more efficient way of using this voting power, we believe this is a good first iteration of the initiative. We look forward to serving on the commission as well as providing feedback after the season to hopefully form an improved anti-capture commission for season 6.

22

Proposal: Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Milestones and Metrics

Vote: Juanbug_PGov and Raho

Rationale: StableLab has worked with both Jun and Raho in the past and they have proved to be great DAO contributors who will be capable of handling the milestones and metrics portion of the grants council

Proposal: Chain Delegation Program

Vote: For

Rationale: We support this initiative to include new OP chains in governance

Proposal: Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Growth Experiments

Vote: Katie Garcia, Matt L, GFX, MoneyManDoug, Michael

Rationale: The existing grants council has done well. While we would eventually like to see turnover to prevent centralization we support 1 more term

Proposal: Code of Conduct Council: Member Nominations

Vote: Oxytocin Juanbug_PGov

Rationale: These contributor have shown to be fit for this position and have gained our support

Proposal: Season 5 Intent Budgets

Vote: For

Rationale: We support these intent budgets as they are reasonable and will help support the optimistic vision

Proposal: Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Builders

Vote: Kaereste

Rationale: StableLab has worked with Kaereste in the past and he has proven to be a great DAO contributor that will continue to thrive in this position

Proposal: Ratification of Law of Chains

Vote: For

Rationale: It is important to create an open neutrality framework to establish protections for the future

Proposal: Security Council Vote #2 – Initial Member Ratification

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab supports this ratification. While we are glad to see this process will transition to elections we think this is a strong group of initial members to begin the security council.

Proposal: Upgrade Proposal #2: Canyon Network Upgrade

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab supports the Canyon Network Upgrade to improve the Optimism Network

Proposal: Upgrade Proposal #3: Delta Network Upgrade

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab supports the Delta Network Upgrade to improve the Optimism Network

Proposal: Proposal to Reclassify Grant Misusage Enforcement

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab supports the transfer of this responsibility to the elected Token House Code of Conduct Council as they will have more expertise and time to investigate the situations.

Proposal: Summary of Code of Conduct enforcement decisions

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab supports the summary of Code of Conduct enforcement decisions as this will improve efficiency and help limit delegate gas costs

Proposal: Protocol Upgrade #4

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab supports this upgrade proposed by OP Labs

Proposal: Mission Requests: Intent #4, 1.33M OP

Vote: Request 4E

Rationale: Increasing the amount of OP used for voting and encouraging new delegate or redelegation will create a more active and safer governance system for OP

Proposal: Mission Requests: Intent #3, 1.33M OP

Vote: 3A,3C,3D,3E

Rationale: After reviewing each mission StableLab believes these 4 missions will provide the most value to the DAO to achieve intent 3

Proposal: Mission Requests: Intent #2, 4M OP

Vote: 2A, 2B, 2D, 2E, 2I, 2J

Rationale: StableLab believes these missions will provide the most value to intent #2

Proposal: Mission Requests: Intent #1, 1.33M OP

Vote: All Intent 1 missions

Rationale: StableLab voted for all options as we believe they all add value and can all fit within the budget

3 Likes