Ignas - Delegate Communication Thread

1. Basic Info

  • Name: Ignas
  • Delegate Address: ignasdefi.eth | 0x3DDC7d25c7a1dc381443e491Bbf1Caa8928A05B0
  • X (Twitter): x.com
  • Telegram: @ignasdefi
  • Website: https://pinkbrains.io/ (Co-founder)

2. Intro

I’m Ignas, a solo researcher with the main focus on DeFi. My mission is to provide clear, in-depth insights helping my audiences stay up-to-date with the latest trends while actively supporting DAO development.

I believe in the decentralized future and it means actively participating in Optimism Collective DAO in every way I can—whether it’s by serving as a delegate, joining working groups, discussing any proposals or seizing new opportunities that come up. I’ll also be sharing key DAO decisions on X and my blog.

3. Delegate Communication Intent

I’m committed to keeping the Optimism community informed with regular, transparent updates. I’ll provide clear insights into my voting choices and reasoning to ensure everyone understands the direction we’re headed and why.

4. Why I Want to be a Delegate
Currently, DeFi DAOs face several internal issues, such as voter apathy leading to governance attacks, insider voting, and voting concentration among a few active voting addresses. Additionally, they face external challenges like regulatory uncertainty.

I believe in a decentralized future, even if it seems naive. However, the current state of crypto is plagued by misaligned incentives that prioritize short-term speculative gains over the core DeFi values of self-sovereignty and custody.

Equally concerning is the trend of McKinsification in DAOs, where decisions are increasingly made by one or two professional consultant delegates. This discourages individual participation, as their opinions and votes have less impact.

To make DeFi DAOs viable, we must align incentives to encourage active participation in governance from the broader crypto community. I believe that community must be at the core of every DAO. Without giving the community a say in protocol governance, we’re no better than the Web2 companies we aim to replace—companies that view their “community” merely as users to extract value from.

I will support initiatives that align token holders with the protocol, such as revenue sharing or other methods to bring value to the token. Token holders are frustrated with exploitative tokenomics that only benefit early insiders who acquired tokens at much lower prices, leaving no upside for new investors. Without incentives to buy and hold tokens, the attractiveness and health of DAOs decline.
As mentioned, I will highlight key votes and decisions of the DAO on X and my blog, as I believe the general public is often unaware of important actions being taken.

5. Disclosure

I am the co-founder of Pink Brains, an organization dedicated to promoting various crypto projects through educational content. You can find more info about us here: pinkbrains | Twitter | Linktree .

I’m a delegate for Lido and Instadapp and will be soon a delegate in here - Optimism Collective. Moreover, I’m actively involved in Uniswap, Arbitrum, Aave,…I plan to apply as a delegate to other DAOs soon, with the same mission of strengthening them and aligning token holders with the protocol.

I always make appropriate disclosures and recuse myself from voting when necessary.

6. Delegation

If anyone would like to delegate to me, please use the following address: 0x3DDC7d25c7a1dc381443e491Bbf1Caa8928A05B0

2 Likes

Date Voted: September 19, 2024

1. Proposal: Rolling Mission Requests (On-chain)

- Vote: For

2. Proposal: Rolling Mission Requests: Voting Cycle 27 (On-chain)

- Vote: For

Date Voted: October 29, 2024

3. Proposal: Governor Update Proposal #3: Enable Onchain Treasury Execution (On-chain)

- Vote: For
- Rationale: I voted For this proposal. It will improve automation, efficiency, and most important - decentralization in Optimism Collective’s treasury management :slightly_smiling_face:

4. Proposal: Season 6: Standard Rollup Charter Ratification (On-chain)

- Vote: For

5. Proposal: Onchain Treasury Transfer Test (On-chain)

  • Date Voted: December 4, 2024
  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: I don’t see any reason to block this. It’s a test to make sure future budget transfers go smoothly and safely.

Date Voted: December 13, 2024

6. Proposal: Onchain Treasury Transfer Cancellation Test (On-chain)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: If this mechanism works well, the DAO can cancel transactions immediately when issues are detected. Voted yes :slightly_smiling_face:

7. Proposal: Upgrade Proposal #11: Holocene Network Upgrade (On-chain)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: I think these changes are a solid upgrade that will make the network stronger and ready for future growth.

8. Proposal: Season 7: Intent Ratification (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

9. Proposal: Season 7: Anticapture Commission Amendment (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

10. Proposal: Season 7: Grants Council Operating Budget (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

11. Proposal: Season 7: Developer Advisory Board Operating Budget (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

12. Proposal: Season 7: Milestones and Metrics Council Operating Budget (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

13. Proposal: Code of Conduct Council Dissolution Proposal (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

14. Proposal: Season 7: Security Council Operating Budget [Onchain] (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

15. Proposal: Grants Council Mission [Onchain] (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

16. Proposal: Decision Market Mission [Onchain] (On-chain)

  • Vote: For

Rationale: Everything looks good on my end. I believe these proposals should be moved forward on Agora

Date Voted: January 13, 2025

17. Proposal: Season 7: Chain Delegation Program Amendment (Onchain)

  • Vote: For

18. Proposal: Grants Council GrantNerd Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for Brichis

19. Proposal: Grants Council Final Reviewer Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for GFX Labs

20. Proposal: Milestones and Metrics Council Reviewer Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for mel.eth (StableLab)

21. Proposal: Developer Advisory Board Audit Request Team Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for noah.eth

22. Proposal: Developer Advisory Board Governance Mission Team Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 50% for Will, 50% for blockdev

23. Proposal: Developer Advisory Board Foundation Mission Team Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for Ed

24. Proposal: Grants Council Operations Elections (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for Bunic

25. Proposal: Security Council Elections Cohort B Members (Onchain)

  • Vote: 100% for L2BEAT

Rationale: Based on the information provided and my experience with some forks, that’s the reason I voted for them.

26. Proposal: Protocol Upgrade: Superchain Registry 2.0 (Onchain)

  • Date Voted: February 5, 2025
  • Vote: For

27. Proposal: Maintenance Upgrade: L1 Pectra Readiness (Onchain)

This is an optimistic approval. Voters will be asked to vote for, against, or abstain. The proposal will automatically pass unless 12% of votable supply vote against

I agree with this proposal, so I did not vote on this on Agora.

28. Proposal: Upgrade Proposal #13: OPCM and Incident Response improvements (Onchain)

  • Date Voted: March 14, 2025
  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: Voted yes! This makes upgrades smoother, security responses faster, and keeps user assets safer.

Date Voted: April 4, 2025

29. Proposal: Upgrade Proposal #14: Isthmus L1 Contracts + MT-Cannon (Onchain)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: This upgrade can makes Optimism stronger, faster, and better at stopping fraud while keeping it competitive in the Layer 2 space. Voted yes

30. Proposal: Upgrade Proposal #15: Isthmus Hard Fork (Onchain)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: This upgrade can makes Optimism stronger, faster, and better at stopping fraud while keeping it competitive in the Layer 2 space. Voted yes