what do you think if we have proposal of wallet that wrote contract to claim OP$ before official claimed except core team, will not be eligible to any OP airdrop after that, because I think it’s not fair for anyone who wait for official announcement.
2 Likes
I claimed on the official OP website, before the official announcement. I did not write or code anything, and used the main website. This was a couple hours before the announcement. Alot of people did the same. There is no reason to penalize them, they all used the official website. It was allowed for a while by accident I understand but still it was official channels.
Also many people authorized OP tokens days in advanced to save a step during claiming and swaps. None of this is an attack or bad. Why would you want to penalize these people? They aren’t hackers.
2 Likes
Such behavior can indeed be defined as “unfair” and can be targeted for punitive measures.
This is fine as claim from website was live for sometime when team was doing the testing.
Not sure if its possible to differentiate between those address, address that used website and direct SC interaction but if it is, then we can exclude those using website.
Why should anyone be punished for utilizing what is available and not ‘hacking’ or exploiting anything? If someone claimed directly from the contract there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with it. We need to stop witch hunting after people that did not do anything wrong. Myself and many others claimed directly from the main website regardless of an announcement. Nobody should be punished for a teams miss step in not preventing it.
Completely Disagree. Too many posts are leaning towards witch hunting/cancel culture which is not a good look
2 Likes
If you are in buffet and you have a plate, you know that you will get the food, there is no rush what so ever. Would you go sneaking into the kitchen just because its open ?
Its just a different way to see the same scenario and i support it.
1 Like
This is a market with causes for profit. If someone wants to capitalize on being smarter then 90% of people by actually using the SC then they should not be penalized regardless of it they sold or not. It does not make sense to penalize an individual for claiming in a different way then others when in it is claims happening from the same Contract just most people depend on a front end to be able to do it. If I could have claimed early and sold at a 8-10x multiple from where most people could have then I am sure I would have just like 90% of anybody else would have done.
What benefit is there in this? You want people to depend on a front end to do their claims. If the team made the proper precautions and measures then the issue likely would not have happened.
EDIT DUE TO REPLY LIMIT ON NEW ACCOUNT TO BELOW:
Understandable. My issues lies in the fact that the official Twitter account (hours post it first being claimable) tweeted stating that it was not an official announcement. At that time people are watching the token price drop. Whether supposed to or not I would say it is too late unless team speaks in more details surrounding the matter.
I claimed prior to the twitter posting “officially”. I attempted to claim the second I heard about it but could not on the website until the time they tweeted their “unofficial” announcement.
Public good I cannot fully argue on because if it was an airdrop and the amount of tokens you received was not solely based upon time of claim then at the end of the day if someone claims at a higher or lower price and their intent is too sell the only loss is money on paper, not invested capital.
I don’t think a team should have a claim option available until it is actually available. If you are able to claim now or in an hour what makes the first or second claim wrong versus an hour later when say an “official” announcement is made.
I might have a skewed opinion but just like when I resold items that are hard to obtain. Being first has many benefits.
I do not think it was supposed to be done but I chop up alot of what happened surrounding the launch to issues in how it was handled by the team. At the end of they day, the team did not necessarily have to launch yesterday.
Hope you have a good day.
benefit- less chaotic launch, unnecessary pressure on team, create bad image about the project.
and no, why would I ask someone to be dependent on front end or SC, its their wish how they want to do it. My concern is time, were they suppose to do it ? Was it done keeping public good in mind? was it normal? And this is the beauty of retroactive airdrop, we learn and adapt, they got it, did what they could but now we adapt.
I can feel we have different opinion on this and that is fine. but if this comes to a final proposal, i am voting yes unless someone provide a valid reason.
1 Like
This makes sense as a comment on the larger Airdrop #1 Feedback Thread
Added a link in that discussion, unlisting this thread to keep the forum clean.
yes.i agree it is right.