I am not a delegate, but I am an active member of the DefiLATAM and OptimismESP community.
I don’t see how this proposal benefits the Optimism ecosystem. I think they should be more detailed in the distribution of tokens, previously approved by the DAO as once the tokens are delivered it may happen that decisions are made that are not aligned with Optimism.
Thanks for sharing. I like the helpful information that DexGuru provides but similar to what other delegates have mentioned, since this governance fund is specifically focused on growing the Optimism ecosystem, I don’t feel this proposal is tailored enough towards Optimism and I will be voting no on this.
Nobody answered my questions on the proposal. So 7 days after my questions post I am forced to vote NO simply due to lack of engagement from the proposer.
We voted no for this proposal. With 100% of the funds being re-granted from a multi-chain project, we don’t think this is the best use of funds to grow the Optimism ecosystem.
We don*t see how DexGuru will incentivize the growth of the Optimism ecosystem.
Contribution: Standard
OP distribution: Inappropriate
Co-incentives: No
Impact in LATAM: Neutral
Suggestions: Reducing the amount and/or clarifying whether there are ideas and features ready to be developed or integrated would be appreciated to better evaluate this proposal.