PGov - Delegate Communication Thread

DAO Operating Budget Midpoint Adjustment

We are For: In favor of this adjustment given the OP price fall from the beginning of the S8 proposal to now.

Season 9 Governance Fund Mission: Developer Advisory Board
Season 9 Governance Fund Mission: Grants Council

We are In Support & In Support: In favor of the budgets and scope for this season for these councils.

Proposal to Align OP Token with Superchain Success

We are For: Excited to see this come to fruition as many years and looking forward to buybacks kick in!

Upgrade 18 - Custom Gas Token v2 and Kona Proofs

We are In Support: Not voting, and in support of this optimistic vote.

Season 9: Security Council Cohort B Member

We are Alex Soto, INK Foundation, OP Labs, Master Mojo, dcbuilder.eth: We are confident in each of these community members/teams.

Upgrade 19b — Karst Hardfork

We are In Support: Not voting, and in support of this optimistic vote.

Security Council Operating Budget

We are For: We support funding the Security Council’s operating budget so the body responsible for the Collective’s safety and emergency response stays adequately resourced. Properly funding protocol security is a straightforward priority for us.

Sequencer ETH Management: 12-Month Renewal and Treasury Optimization

We are For: Renewing the sequencer ETH management mandate for another year while optimizing how that treasury is handled is prudent stewardship of the Collective’s largest revenue-linked asset. We are comfortable extending an established, working arrangement and putting the idle proceeds to more productive use.

Operating Manual Update Proposal

We are For: These are sensible updates that keep the Operating Manual aligned with how the Token House actually runs this season. Governance housekeeping like this is worth doing to avoid drift between the written rules and live practice.

Developer Advisory Board Dissolution Proposal

We are For: We support dissolving the Developer Advisory Board as part of this cycle’s consolidation of the Token House’s council structure. Winding down a body whose mandate has run its course reduces governance overhead, and we would want any still-useful functions absorbed cleanly rather than lost.

Milestones and Metrics Council Dissolution Proposal

We are For: Consistent with our view on the other council wind-downs this cycle, dissolving the Milestones and Metrics Council streamlines the apparatus where a standing body is no longer the most efficient way to deliver the function. We would want milestone and metrics tracking to continue through whatever mechanism succeeds it.

Grants Council Dissolution Proposal

We are For: In line with the other dissolutions this cycle, we support winding down the Grants Council as part of consolidating the council structure. Streamlining governance is healthy so long as the grant function itself is preserved through whatever process replaces the standing council.

Maintenance Upgrade Proposal: Ink Mainnet Fee Vault Config Update and Proposer Rotation

We are In Support: Not voting, and in support of this optimistic vote.

Maintenance Upgrade: Swell Ownership Transfer to AltLayer

We are In Support: Not voting, and in support of this optimistic vote.

Re-designating the User Airdrop Allocation as the Strategic Ecosystem Fund

We are For: This re-designates the 546.9M OP left unused in the User Airdrop allocation into a Strategic Ecosystem Fund the Foundation can deploy for OP Stack partnerships, liquidity and activity incentives on OP Mainnet, and institutional and brand deals. Putting idle airdrop tokens behind a defined growth mandate is a more productive use than leaving them undesignated, and business development is where OP’s competitive position is being decided right now. We would want the Foundation to report on how the fund is deployed so a discretionary allocation of this size stays accountable to the Collective.

1 Like