[DRAFT] [Gov Fund Proposal] Retroactive Loyalty: Vesting OP Rewards for RetroPGF Badgeholders (Seasons 2–7)

Governance Design 📐
1

TL;DR

This proposal allocates 5,000,000 OP to reward past RetroPGF badgeholders (Citizens & Guest voters from RetroPGF Seasons 2–7) for their invaluable service.
Each eligible contributor will receive a share of OP vested over 4 years (1-year cliff, then monthly unlocks) as a retroactive thank-you and to align them with Optimism’s long-term success.

Key points:

  • Early-season badgeholders get a larger share via a quadratic weighting (Season 2 > Season 7) to honor those who did the earliest work.

  • Strengthens Optimism governance by:

    • Recognizing contributors

    • Boosting delegate retention

    • Reinforcing that impact = profit applies to governance stewards as well as builders.

Motivation

Since 2022, dozens of community members have served as RetroPGF badgeholders (“Citizens’ House” voters), distributing ~73.6M OP across Seasons 2–7.

They reviewed hundreds of projects, made complex trade-offs, and received no direct token rewards for this work. The role is demanding, and some experienced badgeholders have disengaged over time due to burnout or lack of incentives.

By retroactively rewarding these contributors with vested OP, we achieve:

  • Fairness & Thanks – Recognizing the people who upheld our “impact = profit” vision, enhancing Optimism’s credibility as a community that takes care of its own.

  • Governance Alignment – Vesting tokens ties recipients to Optimism’s long-term growth, encouraging them to stay active, mentor new badgeholders, and preserve institutional knowledge.

This is both a political statement (“we value our contributors”) and a practical investment in governance capacity.

Proposal Details

Budget

  • Total: 5,000,000 OP from the Governance Fund.

Eligibility

  • All Citizens and Guests who participated in RetroPGF Seasons 2–7 (~150–200 unique addresses).

  • Season 1 excluded (pilot phase, pre-Collective).

Weighting by Season

Season Weight Rationale
S2 1.00 Foundational experiment; heavy workload
S3 0.81 High workload; early-stage refinement
S4 0.64 Mature process; still significant lift
S5 0.49 Efficiency gains; moderate workload
S6 0.36 Improved tooling; larger voter set
S7 0.25 Most recent; lightest workload per badgeholder

Quadratic decrease means early seasons get proportionally more.

OP Allocation per Season

Season Allocation (OP) % of Total
S2 1,408,451 28.2%
S3 1,140,845 22.8%
S4 901,408 18.0%
S5 690,141 13.8%
S6 507,042 10.1%
S7 352,113 7.0%

Per-Season Per-Person Rewards

Season Participants OP / Person
S2 69 20,412
S3 146 7,814
S4 108 8,346
S5 111 6,217
S6 138 3,674
S7* 84 4,192

*S7 participant count is estimated.

ASCII Overview — Allocation & Per-Person Rewards

Season | Total OP (M) | Participants | OP/Person | Relative Share
-------+--------------+--------------+-----------+----------------
S2     | ████████████ 1.41M |  69  | 20,412 OP | ████████████████
S3     | ██████████   1.14M | 146  |  7,814 OP | ████████
S4     | ████████     0.90M | 108  |  8,346 OP | █████████
S5     | ██████       0.69M | 111  |  6,217 OP | ██████
S6     | ████         0.51M | 138  |  3,674 OP | ████
S7     | ███          0.35M |  84  |  4,192 OP | ███

(Bar length corresponds to allocation % — S2 is largest, S7 smallest)

Vesting Mechanism

  • 4 years, 1-year cliff:

    • Months 0–12: no tokens claimable (cliff period)

    • Month 12: 25% unlock

    • Months 13–48: remaining 75% vests monthly (~2.08% per month)

  • Implemented via a secure, audited smart contract (e.g., OpenZeppelin-based).

  • Recipients claim via provided interface or Etherscan.

Incentive Alignment

  • Discourages immediate sell pressure — gradual unlocks keep recipients tied to long-term success.

  • Likely outcomes during vesting period:

    • Serve as delegates (self-delegation or to others)

    • Continue in Citizens’ House or other governance roles

    • Mentor and onboard new badgeholders

Governance Rationale

Why Delegates Should Support:

  • Improves governance legitimacy.

  • Bridges Citizens’ House & Token House by rewarding one chamber for work that benefits the other.

  • Sets a precedent that good governance work is valued and compensated.

Risks & Mitigations

Risks

  • Roster accuracy – Missing or wrong addresses.

  • Conflict of interest – Some Token House delegates may be recipients.

  • Contract security – Potential exploits.

  • Sell pressure – Recipients dumping tokens immediately.

Mitigations

  • Public recipient list & allocation before execution.

  • Invite conflict disclosures; vesting delays any personal benefit.

  • Use audited contracts & Foundation oversight.

  • Vesting smooths out any sell impact.

Precedent

  • Ethereum Protocol Guild – vested donations for devs over 1–4 years.

  • ENS DAO – considered vesting for stewards.

  • Common in Web3 for advisors/team to have multi-year vest.

Outcomes & KPIs

  • Higher governance participation from badgeholders as OP vests.

  • Retention of experienced contributors.

  • Improved proposal quality in both Houses.

  • KPI: % of these vested tokens actively voting after 1, 2, 3 years.

For any discussion please comment below. Thank you for considering this proposal.

2

Those are amazing news; have no idea if I’ll receive any but congrats to all voters as me :slight_smile: