Yāall were ass holes not coming out with the āofficial announcementā and simultaneous coinbase listing until like 6 hours after the claims site went live. Claims site should have been live as soon as the smart contract was launched and that should have been announced all together.
The Beacon Chain depositors have the true diamond handers. They would be helpful to be hodlers on the network. The airdrop for me was pretty buggy never had enough gas to be able to claim due to network load. Had to bridge in more eth to get the required gas.
First iteration was rocky but thatās the point to continue iterations as we improve. Communications from the team was great!
Cross-posting feedback from
1 Like
This sounds like a fair idea, could this be done so as to show appreciation for those who support what they can, as what they can might not be much but to the project it ads up huge and brings loyalty of the small but many
2 Likes
Because you care more about profits than keeping your tokens safe in your wallet?
If you already profited in the #1 airdrop why do you need more from airdrop #2 or whatever? Airdrop #2 shouldnāt be for profit takers because they have plenty of ways to take profits. They donāt need more tokens via a #2 airdrop. It should be quite easy to understand why people that sold their #1 airdrop donāt need a #2.
Exactlyā¦ congratulations thatās why people selling donāt need airdrop #2.
1 Like
I am against it, once they claim it, its their token and they have full right on what they want to do with it. What will be the eligibility criteria for next airdrop that is yet to be decided and if this proposal comes there I will vote against it. OP Team has mentioned this earlier too, they are not against selling and no one should be.
I can still agree on giving incremental reward, like you sold 50% of your claimed stack in 24hr, you will get less reward in comparison to someone who sold after 1 week. Just like we did this time, different criteria and different reward but blocking them is wrong and I dont support it.
If you dont want them to sell, give them a soul bound NFT.
What I am totally support is blocking the address that claimed via smart contract before it was live, officially. More here
1 Like
People selling at $3 and $2 did it before the āofficialā release.
Anyway, letās make this even simpler. Everyone that got in the #1 airdrop shouldnāt be eligible for airdrop #2. Sureā¦ people will always find ways to get some more tokens from airdrop #2 anyway but why should we give more tokens to the same people?
By the way, many people seem to assume they will get more tokens in airdrop #2 but they need to assume the opposite.
2 Likes
we are not on the same page, i guess, price does not matter, if they sold or not, if they are providing LP or participating in gov, it does not matter. What I am advocating is the approach they choose was against public good, it was chaotic, instead of waiting for few more hours they choose to take the another path. This should not be encouraged and I would vote to discard those addresses.
Again, I am not talking about future drop, we have lot of time for that, I am talking about what happened and what we can do to discourage such behavior.
Beauty of iterative approach is falling can be fun too, we failed at launch but for next one we are more prepared.
1 Like
If you believe in this then price was the main factor for claiming as soon as possible. Why would they rush the claim otherwise?
Iām still not sure if it was a bad thing, overall it was neutral and a nice stress test to the network.
this isnt my concern as this thread is not related to discuss the seller intention. What we have as of now is addresses of user who used the SC and now we need to reach on a consensus, what action the team can take to penalize such user.
Good Ecosystem and fast
I agree with this guy!!
I think sybil filtering was a good idea because many people who spam the wallet for additional airdrops wonāt be able to claim their prizes.
Despite the fact that I received a large airdrop by donating simply in Gitcoin, I think the airdrop size was way too much for what I have done.
Hey,
I think I am eligible for the airdrop because of L1 bulk checkout on Gitcoin. But it is saying otherwise. Can I post the txid here so someone can shed light on it? Thanks!
In crypto community, airdrops are usually aimed at big volume traders and the small guy is almost always termed as an airdrop farmer and left out. I hate that. I thank the optimism team for not doing that and that is what increases my trust in the project by many folds.
Not every small investor is an airdrop farmer. The point can be clearly seen by looking at the accounts who sell their $OP and who donāt sell. Why are the people who got the largest amount of airdrop and dump it, not called airdrop farmers?
People who get small allocation of $OP have a very good reason to sell $OP and get some much needed money. So, if they are not selling their $OP (believe me it is very hard to resist), that says something about their trust in the project and community.
So, I think that optimism should keep that in mind moving forward and accordingly reward such accounts and not the ACTUAL AIRDROP FARMERS who already have a lot of money and get huge chunks of airdrop and sell it to tank the project. It could be an experiment worth doing if we aim to bring the crypto to masses.
To be honest, Iāve only flirted with the idea of even using Optimism.
Never fully engaged, since I was kind of waiting out to see which L2 would rise to the top.
Iāve mainly only been engaged in only L1 chains, like ETH, AVAX, FTM, and SOL, and only received a small OP airdrop for being a Curve DAO voter.
I believe that adding that small amount for DAO members was a good tactic and will encourage more activity, both in governance and dApps. Even with the small amount.
So for me, it got my attention!!!
Iām going to keep my OP, participate in governance, while also looking to add more positions on the supported dApps, especially for ones Iām already involved in like Curve and AAVE on other chains.
Nice touch!!!
1 Like
more airdrop for OP Diamomd hand Holder
In my opinions, next airdrop should include holder of the OP, and more for donators.
the idea of widespread airdrop to attach more user to Optimism chain is good but I think if you can do the option for KYC to get more airdrop will gather more collective data for future of Optimism.
Why are you assuming that small investors didnāt dump their tokens and only the ones with larger amounts of OP sold quick? Thatās not right because I followed the Discord token-chat a few days prior to the launch date and many couldnāt wait to claim and dump the token.
I am 100% sure many of them where small bags and the differentation which should be made is:
Who holds the airdrop (regardless if a whale or a small bag holder) after the launch and who dumps it?
Every holder is important to the ecosystem and an active governance. Thus a time calculation would make sense: the longer one holds OP, the more rewards he should receive for airdrop round #2
2 Likes
I totally agree with this topiv, please take this into account.
1 Like