What is your Evaluation Criteria for Phase 1 Proposals?

Thank you for creating this thread, this might help us combine ideas on what a good proposal should contains.

Its difficult to say what a good proposal should look like as its project dependent, we can not treat a NFT based based project to defi project which will be totally different from an infra project. Approach I am taking is, discarding project focusing on forced or artificial TVL and making the good or even a debatable proposal more visible so that it can reach wider audience and is why I provided my support to few projects in last 2 days.

Now few things that I am looking for in a proposal:

  1. Duration of token distribution
  2. Who is the target audience(user / dev /app integration )
  3. Willingness to provide report/data on how the reward was distributed either monthly/quarterly. I dont care if OP team will read them or not but If I am voting “yes” for a project, I will read those report and see where the funds are being used.
  4. Will this proposal boost TVL and/or on-chain activities in an sustainable way?

I am considering Phase 1 is little relaxed in terms of goal, Phase 0 was focused more on TVL, but this can go beyond that as long as its supporting OP ecosystem.

Looking for inputs and suggestions.

Edit1:- On point 3, as pointed out by @InfinityWallet here, this does seems to involve some privacy concern, which somehow I overlooked. Until we find a better approach without compromising the privacy, I will remove this from evaluation criteria.

5 Likes