Totally agreed with you
Totally agree with you
Totally agreed for contribute strong OP ecosystem
@ and what do you think about slashing future %'s of airdrops for initial sellers like this?
Try to reward certain behaviors rather than punish certain behaviors. For example, the reward holds 1000 $ops or 10000 $ops. Instead of banning sales.
Disagree about disqualify those who sold but should be reward for those who âdidnt transfer or soldâ !
youâre right, but letâs notice that in most of the chains, the airdrop raises questions, maybe by discussing it here and there we will end up finding a methodology that will be beneficial for the whole ecosystem. Even if it is futile for here, I think it is healthy for the whole crypto universe.
I agree with you, This is a great idea.100% . im waiting for stake op <3
someone like me claimed OP and transfered to hardware wallet what about them??
I agree, the people that selling their drop should not be able to have access to future drops
If your intention is to sell the token eventually, it doesnât matter if you sell it now or 3 months later, you are intended to sell it. Letâs face it, the majority of the people just want more tokens. Will they REALLY participate in governance? If the token becomes non-transferable(or goes to zero), Iâm sure all of a sudden they would find governance not interesting anymore. This proposal is like introducing staking without actually saying it.
Personally, I think we should just do all governance in the citizen house, one vote per person, like in real life. And just delete the OP token. VC and the Optimism team can convert to equity instead.
I donât think this is necessary. By definition, those that are selling are removing themselves from governance. It will literally handle itself without governance action. If they receive new tokens in the future, and sell them as well, and this causes the price to drop, then they are giving people who have not been awarded an airdrop a means to join the governance community.
So far, Iâm only seeing positive outcomes to general distribution of tokens to everyone who qualifies, regardless of their desire to govern or delegate or sell.
The only downside to airdrop recipients selling is the price drop, and the only people that âhurtsâ is speculators that intend to sell when the price is higher.
2 Likes
Nice but what about liquidity providers
Liquidity providers are the backbone of the protocol and they shouldnât be in disadvantage by any means. If someone sells half of his airdrop for a LP-pool and he will be excluded from future airdrops this is a problem and not fair
Agree But 1st Remove the Whales are From Airdrop List
all people want profit i think mostly people have taget when sell. if op = 1$ have some peolpe sell and have many people hold but if op = 100 $ i think have many people sell . 10-20k accounts sell because they satisfied in price.
1 Like
Totally agreed with you.
I think the multiplier is the right way to go here, just because of narrative reasons really.
From Optimismâs perspective there is no real benefit to giving tokens to people just so they can sell them, while people can frame it as helping to provide market liquidity or whatever, those arenât really core benefits to the Optimism Collective. Lots of the arguments here that sellers shouldnât miss out on the next airdrop seem to not be thinking about it in terms of the primary reason for the drop, itâs not to egalitarianly give people money.
On the other hand, clearly plenty of people who do want to participate in governance, public goods discussion, building the ecosystem and other general phoenix spawning activities will still have sold some of their tokens, even if just for tax reasons.
Therefore rather than blacklisting addresses, surely the solution is that sellers should get less of the next airdrop. Obviously it doesnât numerically make much of a difference if this takes the form of multiplying the next allocation by the percentage you held (so if you sold 20% youâd only receive 80% of the next one) or the inverse with lower base amounts, so non-sellers would get extra by some factor compared to sellers⌠but because humans arenât great at maths Iâm sure the latter would be seen as the better option!
[Edit - Disclaimer - I havenât sold and donât intend to, this may bias my opinion]
5 Likes
Definitely buying it more.
This is very well-reasoned, and just to add on, I think when people really internalize that there is going to be another airdrop, those that sold would have a strong incentive to avoid using optimism just out of spite.