Vote: Yes.
Rationale: Aligned toward supporting Optimism’s collective intent of a set of interoperable Stage 1 chains doing $250m per month in cross-chain asset transfers.
Retro Funding: Onchain Builders Mission
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: Aligned with and supports the intent impact goal of rewarding interoperable onchain builders. Overall sizing and allocation methodology are reasonable.
Retro Funding: Dev Tooling Mission
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: Aligned with and supports the intent impact goal of supporting onchain builders in developing interop-compatible applications. Overall sizing and allocation methodology are reasonable.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports testing this functionality.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab is aligned toward supporting Optimism’s collective intent of a set of interoperable Stage 1 chains doing $250m per month in cross-chain asset transfers.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports this upgrade.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports the changes to the AC Charter.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports alisha.eth and the funding of the Security Council as outlined.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports Gonna.eth as Grants Council Lead; grant sizing and methodology for the council appear sound.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports zachobront as Developer Advisory Board Lead; grant sizing and methodology for the council appear sound.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports Juanbug_PGov as Milestones & Metrics Council Lead; grant sizing and methodology for the council appear sound.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports dissolution as these functions are responsibly moved to other working groups.
Vote: Yes.
Rationale: StableLab supports funding of the Grants Council as outlined with the caveat that onboarding of the member signers by the Foundation be completed as immediately as practical.
Vote: No.
Rationale: StableLab is not in full support of the sizing of this Mission relative to the requirement put on the community by the yet unproven allocation methodology outlined. In essence we find the attention economy of a mission to be too broad and recommend that this endeavor perhaps eventually be part of a larger governance mission framework to support innovation of this type. Already in practice there are more proven grant allocation methodologies with significantly less overhead cost to drive the expected impact.
Upgrade Proposal #11: Holocene Network Upgrade
Vote: No Veto.
Rationale: No objections to this planned upgrade.