Hi guys, first of all big thanks to the Optimism Foundation for your relentless efforts and for spearheading initiatives that strengthen and elevate our collective governance participation.
Also special nod to @MinimalGravitas for raising a valid point about voting participation calculation and its discrepancies!
We’d like to contribute some insights. My team, behind the OP governance analytics dashboard - has been closely monitoring governance activities and voting participation. Our data indicates that MinimalGravitas was active in 3 out of the 4 (75%) proposal during Season 4 (starting June 8th) and since we went onchain voting, MinimalGravitas voted on 14 out of the 15 proposals (that’s 93.3%). When we look at the requirement for the Top 100 delegates on the snapshot date, MinimalGravitas secured the 62nd rank for delegate by voting power. Both of these facts clearly meet the >70% voting participation criteria for the rewards.
A detailed view of the MinimalGravitas proposals participation can be accessed here: MinimalGravitas Delegate
Our aim is to contribute to greater transparency for initiatives like these. We’re here to collaborate, enhance how we operate, and ensure everyone has access to the information they need. We always welcome your thoughts and ideas on how we can improve further.
Moreover, it would be great to hear from the foundation regarding this matter to clarify and perhaps validate the data. A cooperative and collective dialogue could further refine our processes and reinforce accuracy and transparency moving forward.