Thank you @OPUser . We always enjoy your thoughtful feedback.
Currently taking your points into consideration and will re-work the airdrop distribution.
We are thinking of adding limits to each range so that it does not get misused by “airdrop hunters” (for lack of a better word. Apologies if this term offends anyone). Kromatika really wants quality users to be onboarded the ecosystem.
What are your thoughts on this?
1 Like
Sounds good. Dont forgot to ask for feedback on discord too
2 Likes
@OPUser : the limit order airdrop details have been updated. Would love to hear your feedback. Kromatika is really hoping to get delegate votes this time around.
1 Like
Dear delegates, if you have read our proposal and would like to see this move forward, please state your approval in the following OP-requested format:
“I am an Optimism delegate [link to your delegate commitment] with sufficient voting power and I believe this proposal is ready to move to a vote.”
Tagging a few delegates here: @katie @OPUser @lavande @diligit
2 Likes
Hi @Kromatika , Thank you for the tag and most important, appreciate your pro-activeness.
I dont hold enough voting power to provide my approval but I am happy with the proposal and changes you have done. Happy to vote in favor during voting.
2 Likes
I am an Optimism delegate [Delegate Commitments - #18 by katie] with sufficient voting power and I believe this proposal is ready to move to a vote.
3 Likes
Thank you @katie for your vote. Appreciate the time and effort put in to review Kromatika’s proposal.
2 Likes
Taking the liberty to tag a few more delegates to take a look at Kromatika’s proposal and grant us the one remaining vote required to proceed to week 3.
@linda @GFXlabs @fig @Bobbay_StableLab
Thank you so much delegates for your effort and time!!! 
2 Likes
I like your proposal, but I am not a delegate and cannot approve it.
2 Likes
I am an Optimism delegate [Delegate Commitments - #26 by OPUser] with sufficient voting power and I believe this proposal is ready to move to a vote.
After writing this, I realized that we should also provide our reasoning.
Many changes are reflected in the new proposal, none of token is going towards team or being used to boost their native token price. Amount of token request is justifiable and distribution is clear.
3 Likes
Thank you @diligit . Appreciate the time you took to go through Kromatika’s proposal 
Now that Kromatika is through to the next round, we hope you’ll vote in favor of Kromatika when voting begins.
Appreciate you !!
2 Likes
Thank you so much @OPUser 
Kromatika appreciates you. Thank you for the time and effort put into reviewing the proposal and your constant support.
2 Likes
Kromatika proposal has been reviewed by the DeFi Committee A with a voting recommendation: Yes.
Rationale: This is a clear and well-thought-out plan for distribution. It is a reasonable request in size. We appreciate Kromatika taking previous feedback into consideration and revising their proposal. We are happy that the marketing allocation is going towards Optimism and would like to see a follow up on in the future.
Please find the full committee A Recommendations below:
2 Likes
Voted : For
Agree with the committee decision.
Precise and well written proposal focused on growing the ecosystem.
2 Likes
Defi Committee A Recommendation
Voting recommendation: Yes
Rationale: This is a clear and well-thought-out plan for distribution. It is a reasonable request in size. We appreciate Kromatika taking previous feedback into consideration and revising their proposal. We are happy that the marketing allocation is going towards Optimism and would like to see a follow up on in the future.
Note: Linda Xie abstained from this committee decision since there is a potential conflict of interest with 0x / Matcha which Linda’s husband co-founded.
4 Likes
The defi shadow committee – which is not an official committee – advises against voting for this proposal.
We’d need to see substantial changes before supporting this proposal. There is overreliance on supporting a native token without any clear benefit to users (including the gas fee subsidy, which is a subsidy for the protocol, not users), the product hasn’t achieved obvious product-market fit on Optimism or on other chains, and the asks are disproportionate to anticipated user growth or welfare on Optimism.
We understand that this has already gone through a round of revisions, and the Kromatika team have been more than flexible in following these revisions, but the guidance has in our opinion been ill-advised in the face of some unaddressed fundamental issues. We’d be happy to advise on an additional round of guidance if this proposal doesn’t pass.
3 Likes
Thanks for the unofficial committee feedback.
As one of the Kromatika proposal author,I believe this advice is too much biased and is not an objective advise, probably due to conflict of interest with other protocols and especially a “fight” between the official DeFi A committee within Tarrot proposal on the committee recommendations for Tarrot, resulting into Tarrot proposal supporters going against the committee decisions as a rage option.
As Kromatika author speaking on behalf of the other authors,I would kindly request to take the committee “fight” elsewhere with the official DefiA committee and not do it on Kromatika’s proposal back.
We are supporting your case on the Tarrot proposal, but please leave Kromatika out of it. It was already referenced in some of the Tarrot proposal replies.
Thanks for the consideration. No hard feeling.
2 Likes