Real users should be rewarded, the ones who actively/repeatedly use Optimism dapps. I disagree OP quest-collectors are real users, unless they repeatedly use the same dapps
Governance voters are real users because they actively take part in the Token house/Optimism governance
I donāt want to disagree or start a fight, but just to let you know:
I have also self-delegated my tokens, and did qualify for the airdrop.
So while the 2000 OP threshold may have been too high for many, itās incorrect to say those who self-delegated (i.e. didnāt delegate to someone else) and voted in Snapshots ādidnāt get anythingā.
Thatās the point: ONLY if you (self)-delegated you received the allocation. If you voted in Snapshot governance proposals you didnāt qualify which doesnāt make any sense
Oh sorry, I didnāt know you could vote at all in Snapshot if you hadnāt delegated to yourself or someone else.
I had thought that if there were no tokens delegated, to either yourself or another, then your voting power was zero (and thus you couldnāt vote, or at least your vote didnāt count).
If the situation is something else, then I apologise for my misunderstanding.
so tell me what Dapp do you use in Optimism.
I donāt trade often and I donāt even know which DeFi APR is high.
I like to collect and trade NFT , but there is no choice for I to enjoy.
And Quix is soft-rugged.
so, in OP teamās side, any users like me are fake user?
Can you please let us know what project are you building?
We are building the Fractal Visions NFT marketplace on Optimism and once secondary sales are going we will start running token rewards for the ecosystem!!
I regularly use Synthetix, Pika protocol, Lyra Finance, Polynomial, Uniswap, Sushiswap, Stargate and Kwenta. But there are plenty of more dapps to be used. Just check out the dapps overview on the Optimism website
Kudos to the ones who made the proposal for a smooth airdrop #2! Maybe we can have a mix of it in the futureā¦controversy creates attention sometimes ā¦
Feedback on Airdrop #2 can be shared here