CyberDyn0x Delegate Thread

Delegates 🏛 Delegate Updates
4

Cycle 12a

We believe all the proposals in cycle 12a reflect our governance value #3 Collaboration through positive-sum games to go further together. While differences in individual perspectives are reflected in Decisions > Votes here, our team are collectively aligned on governance values and voted as follows.

Protocol Delegation

FOR this proposal as it also reflects

  1. Progressive decentralization, in favour of distributed &/or decentralized &/or subsidiarity autonomy

  2. Experimentation, the courage to take risks, learn from mistakes and build collective knowledge

  3. Engage w the community (& stakeholders) to seek diverse perspectives

Intent 1 Towards Technical Decentralization

FOR this proposal as it also reflects

  1. Unbiased stewardship, advancing the needs of the collective ahead of any individual

  2. Progressive decentralization, in favour of distributed &/or decentralized &/or subsidiarity autonomy

  3. Structural mechanisms (code if possible) that align incentives and uphold equality

  4. Challenge the status quo to drive progress and innovation

Intent 2 Innovate on Novel Application

While we believe this proposal also positively reflects #8 Effective decision-making, communication and stakeholder advocacy. We voted AGAINST this proposal due to concerns in regard to a combination of factors across

  1. Unbiased stewardship, advancing the needs of the collective ahead of any individual

  2. Progressive decentralization, in favour of distributed &/or decentralized &/or subsidiarity autonomy

  3. Radical transparency to minimise information asymmetry

  4. Structural mechanisms (code if possible) that align incentives and uphold equality

  5. Engage w the community (& stakeholders) to seek diverse perspectives

Intent 3 Awareness of the Optimistic Vision

While we believe alignment with the Optimistic Vision is core to collective success, we voted AGAINST this proposal due to concerns in regard to a combination of factors across

  1. Radical transparency to minimise information asymmetry

  2. Effective decision-making, communication and stakeholder advocacy

  3. Engage w the community (& stakeholders) to seek diverse perspectives

Intent 4 Governance Accessibility

FOR this proposal as it also reflects

  1. Unbiased stewardship, advancing the needs of the collective ahead of any individual

  2. Progressive decentralization, in favour of distributed &/or decentralized &/or subsidiarity autonomy

  3. Empathy & alignment to achieve peaceful governance & judicious outcomes

  4. Engage w the community (& stakeholders) to seek diverse perspectives

Cycle 12b

Treasury Appropriation

AGAINST this proposal, we could not meaningfully align this proposal with our governance values, except to engage w the community (& stakeholders) to seek diverse perspectives.

Inflation Adjustment Proposal

AGAINST this proposal, due to concerns relating to

  1. Radical transparency to minimise information asymmetry
  2. Structural mechanisms (code if possible) that align incentives and uphold equality

Growth & Builders Council Elections

We used the Borda Count method to aggregate our preferences and identify the council members we voted for. We believe it is important to understand the benefits and trade-offs of different preference aggregation methods and have proposed knowledge building to address this in our Foundation RFP Bid

1 Like