Collective Feedback Commission Communication Thread

Welcome to the CFC Communication Thread!

The Collective Feedback Commission (CFC) was piloted beginning in Season 5 as part of the path to open metagovernance. As outlined in the Collective’s Working Constitution, the Foundation’s role is to bootstrap the governance system of the Collective over multiple years, gradually bringing more governance rights online until the system can manage itself. Metagovernance refers to the ability to propose changes to the design of the governance system. Given the importance of this responsibility, metagovernance is the last governance responsibility that will be transferred to the community.

The CFC serves as an experimental training ground to develop a “Core Governance Program” that will allow the Collective to take on metagovernance responsibilities in the future. The inspiration for this program is Core Development Programs. The goal of the CFC is to enable the Foundation to become just one of many Core Governors proposing metagovernance proposals in the future (similar to how OP Labs is just one of many Core Developers proposing protocol upgrades.)

Responsabilities

The next iteration of the CFC began on November 4th and will run through the end of Season 7.

  • Individual members of the Collective Feedback Commission will:

    • Provide feedback on early Foundation design drafts, roadmaps, frameworks, etc.
    • Participate in broader design discussions with the Foundation via monthly meetings
    • Provide feedback on community authored Mission Requests to ensure they align with Season 7 Intents and/or other strategic initiatives
    • Execute on contributions as scoped by the Foundation (members of the Design Research track will do this via Project Partnerships)Note: The Foundation will use feedback from Commission members as an input but is not obligated to incorporate any individual piece of feedback or implement the recommendations in any contribution. Commission feedback will be shared with the Foundation and other Commission members, and may be made publicly viewable by the entire community at the end of the Commission’s term. The Foundation will provide summaries of the impact of all contributions.
  • Foundation Track Leads will:

    • To the best of our ability, request feedback on regular feedback cycles. Project Partnerships will be scoped with clear deliverables and deadlines.
    • Host monthly calls with the Foundation governance design team to share context and facilitate a two-way dialogue with Commission members.
    • Propose a selection mechanism that determines which members claim specific pieces of work, subject to simple majority approval by members at the start of the term.
  • The Commission Lead will:

    • Onboard new Commission members, ensuring they are familiar with the CFC’s processes, mission, and operational structure. This includes providing any necessary documentation or training to help them contribute effectively from the start.
    • Propose the evaluation algorithm by which rewards will be distributed to individual members at the start of the term, subject to majority (51%) approval (see “Rewards” section below).
    • Ensure members of each track are executing on their responsibilities in a timely manner and flag any blockers to execution to the Foundation.
    • Facilitate feedback loops and coordination between Commission members and the Foundation, when needed, holding the Foundation accountable to this Charter.
    • Organize regular Commission meetings, as desired by members. The frequency of internal meetings is at the discretion of the Commission Lead but should be aligned with governance minimization.
    • Authoring, or coordinating authorship, of any regular communication reports circulated to the broader community.
    • Conduct feedback survey, facilitate peer reviews, and host retrospective workshop at the end of the Commission’s term to inform the next iteration

Read the full description here.

Members

The Collective Feedback Commission will be split into three different tracks to allow for different levels of engagement and to accommodate different types of expertise:

Operational (Governance Processes) Lead: Julian
Organizational (Governance Structures) Lead: Maxwell
Design Research Lead: Justine
CFC Lead: Simona

Track 1 - Operational Members:

joanbp
Amy
SEEDGov

Track 2 - Organizational Members:

alisha.eth
Gonna.eth
zachobront
web3magnetic
juankbell

Track 3 - Design Research Members:

UniswapFoundation
jackanorak
ccerv1
LauNaMu
gloriakw
Gonna.eth
zachobront
Kiran
saraha
kaereste
spengrah
alisha.eth

Internal Operating Procedures

11 Likes

100 days of CFC v2

CFC v2 was launched Nov 4th 2024 and will run until June 11th 2025. The CFC is intended to serve as an experimental training ground to develop a “Core Governance Program” that will allow the Collective to take on metagovernance responsibilities in the future.

100 days in, CFC v2 has been working towards this evolution of the Collective’s role in metagovernance. Season 7 so far has been about more collaborative governance design, deepening shared context, and structuring participation based on expertise for clearer, higher-impact contributions.

What the CFC has been involved in so far:

Project Partnerships → Deep dives into governance experiments & mechanisms:

This is a list of the ongoing project partnerships CFC members are currently involved in:

- Futarchy Experiment – In H1 2025, Optimism is partnering with Butter and Uniswap Foundation to test whether futarchy makes for “better” grants allocation decision than existing structures. This partnership involves CFC members testing the UI and live experiment design in order to deliver focused feedback on viability, structure and flow.

- Retro Funding Mission Metrics – An ongoing effort in refining metrics to measure impact. This project partnership is about collaborating on metric refinement and the feedback process

- Season 8 Budget Board – Helping improve financial planning for the next season

-Guest voter experiment - Active CFC participation in research, data analysis and subsequent implications for selection mechanisms for S8

Ongoing Feedback Loops → Continuous refinement of governance processes.

These are the verticals the CFC has been providing feedback on and insights into so far:

Season 7 Preview - Feedback from the CFC was useful in improving areas of communication that were unclear, confusing, or under-defined and drafts were updated to reflect these changes and clarifications as a result of CFC input.

Retrospective Guidance – CFC members helped increase clarity across from the board on Retrospectives, which helped inform S7 budgets and Charter amendments. Members across CFC tracks provided in depth feedback as exemplified here:

ACC Feedback
CoCC Feedback
DAB Feedback
SC Feedback
GC Feedback & GC Feedback

The feedback provided by the CFC will also inform updates to the Representative Structure Retrospective Template for Season 7.

Season 7 Election Candidate Profiles – Addressing the challenge of elections functioning as popularity contests by introducing data-driven profiles to help voters assess candidates based on their qualifications and contributions. Members are contributing to better answer the following questions:

  • How can profiles improve transparency and informed voting?
  • What data points would help delegates make better decisions?

Season 7 Operating Budget and Charter Amendment Feedback

  • Aligning budget proposals with impact generated by each Council or Board
  • Facilitating healthy discussions on governance costs before voting
  • Evaluating whether budget increases correspond to real added responsibilities

Retro Funding Sign-Up UXR – Enhancing clarity in onboarding for builders in order to provide better support and fewer friction points in the Retro Funding process.

Impact So Far

More influence: Commission members now provide feedback earlier in the process—moving from post-design critiques to shaping governance at the planning and research stage

Increased clarity: Members now have more defined roles & responsibilities, scoped out by expertise and track, improving timelier engagement and focused insights

Higher Context: Improved connection with Foundation achieved through:

  • Regular cadence of monthly CFC x Foundation meetings and internal biweekly CFC syncs
  • Timelier engagement and increased lead time in involving CFC members in feedback process and project partnerships to ensure as many contributions are incorporated in experiments and specific governance design
  • Leads are now attending Foundation off-sites when relevant to their role and council remits
  • CFC Lead holding holding Foundation accountable and delivering CFC feedback on process and progress in real time in order to make necessary adjustments in a timely manner

CFC Success Metrics:

The success of v2 will be determined based on the following matrix used to assess progress as a programme unfolds.

  • Number of new ideas proposed and implemented as a result of Commission input (> 8)

  • % of drafts in which feedback was ranked as “high value” by the Foundation (> 70%)

  • NPS score from Foundation governance team (= > 5/7)

The below measures will be used to evaluate the success of the Foundation in managing this program:

  • Member ranking of clarity of role 8.5+ (up from 7.7/10 in v1)
  • Member ranking of clarity of responsibilities 9+ (up from 7.6/10 in v1)
  • Member ranking of Commission efficacy 8.5+ (up from 6.9/10 in v1)

Updates on CFC work will be posted at a regular cadence to ensure the Collective is informed of the work and progress the CFC is making carrying out its mission.