Simply holding OP tokens shouldn’t be the only way to receive future drops. People should be rewarded for engaging with the Optimism ecosystem, whether that’s building, using dApps, or contributing to governance. Totally agree with you!
it was for the guys who dumped it.
agreed with you
tnx 
Totally agreed with all of this 
Totally agreed with this topic.
I agree with Kryos and Vikram here… I think banning them is a bad idea, judgmental, and assumptive. It also is a slippery slope.
That’s a good idea! You can take it out to some extent, but I think taking it out as a whole means that you are no longer active in OP.
1 Like
I fully support your proposal. Such people cannot be part of the community ecosystem and should not receive repeated rewards.
You are right, and I think it is these # wallet wallets that should be rewarded.
It is good ideas. People who sold airdrop OP token should be marked ineligible
Sounds ridiculous. How SELFISH the guy is.
I agree in this question only the most dedcated on OPTIMISM should get an AIRDROP-.
I understand the frustration but this is not the right way to go, a healthy ecosystem and token requires free movement and liquidity.
1 Like
Although I still haven’t sold the OP of airdrop #1, I don’t agree with this proposal, it will hurt the community, not beneficial!
Of course, there is another way to motivate users who have not sold OP
1 Like
First, we list some assumptions currently made by existing FCFS proposals (note there are no new assumptions) 
when will the distribution of 14 percent of tokens allocated to the community be linear or not? 
you can immediately see the competent search for information 
Agreed. Dumpers are just as bad or worse than Sybils 
Right, but note this is for the current Alpha release, which still relies on a central sequencer. 
incredibly useful information that allows you to get airdrops in other similar projects