The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @kaereste and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We’re voting FOR the proposal.
While the chain delegation program was not utilized in Season 5, we view it as a promising initiative that could be further explored. We acknowledge the concerns raised by our fellow delegates, and we share some of them, but we believe they are not substantial enough to warrant a ‘no’ vote from us.
In our view, for the Superchain’s vision to succeed, it is important that all member chains are actively engaged in governance. This engagement is not merely a matter of voting; rather, it necessitates meaningful and impactful participation.
The importance of this engagement is underscored by the fact that the decisions made through governance directly and immediately impact the Superchain’s member chains.
Therefore, it is of utmost importance that these member chains are not mere spectators. They should have a meaningful voice and influence in the decision-making process. This is crucial to ensure their active contribution and meaningful participation in shaping the trajectory and future of the Superchain.
In order to achieve this active participation we need to encourage those chains to get involved early and we believe this program gives a chance to make it happen.