S8 Retro Funding Missions

[system]

In 2025, Retro Funding sharpens its focus on data-driven impact measurement, using targeted Missions to develop robust methods for evaluating specific types of contributions.

The Retro Funding Missions from S7, Onchain Builders and Dev Tooling, will continue in S8. In addition, we propose expanding the program’s scope to include a new Mission focused on OP Stack dependencies, ensuring sustained support for critical infrastructure.

OpenSource Observer will continue leading the evaluation algorithm development, more details on the Retro Funding governance process can be found here.

Onchain Builders

Retro Funding: Onchain Builders rewards application developers for their contributions to Superchain growth and interop adoption.

• Total Budget: up to 1.35M OP, as proposed by the Budget Board here.
• Expected impact on the Intent: Drive Superchain activity and interop adoption by rewarding application developers for their impact on the Superchain.
• Eligibility: Projects are eligible who have deployed their own contracts on eligible OP Chains
• Evaluation Algorithm: The Evaluation Algorithm will be an iteration of what has been used in S7. You can find in-depth documentation on S7 Evaluation Algorithms here. The following categories of impact will be rewarded:
  1. General contract activity: Application developers will be rewarded for building and maintaining popular applications on the Superchain. Activity will be measured within the categories of TVL, Transaction activity, Gas fees contributions and monthly active users.
     This category will make up the majority of reward allocation.
  2. Interop: Once interop is live, the program will have dedicated incentives for application developers who have integrated interop functionality. To enable this, a percentage of the budget will be reserved for interop.
• Measurement Date: Monthly, starting in August. Rewards will be delivered on a monthly basis.

Strategic Rationale

1. Drives Superchain Usage and Growth: Onchain applications are the primary driver of transactions, gas fees, and user activity. Retro Funding rewards the builders behind these apps, aligning their incentives with the Superchain’s long-term success.
2. Accelerates Interop Adoption: By recognizing builders who integrate interop functionality, Retro Funding provides targeted incentives for widespread interop adoption.
3. Builds long term alignment: Instead of relying on short-term grants or mercenary capital, Retro Funding offers builders a durable stream of rewards tied to real usage.

---

Dev Tooling

Retro Funding: Dev Tooling rewards toolchain software, such as compilers, libraries and debuggers, that support builders in developing onchain applications on the Superchain.

• Total Budget: Up to 3.65M OP, as proposed by the Budget Board here
• Expected impact on the Intent: Improve the builder experience leading to more successful applications on the Superchain
• Eligibility: Eligible projects include those that have created an open source repository and/or package that is used by builders on the Superchain
• Evaluation Algorithm: Rewards Dev Tools based on their usage by onchain builders. The Evaluation Algorithm will be an iteration of the Evaluation Algorithm used in S7. A key priority for S8 will be to extend the scope of this program to include OS Dev Tools used by OP Chains, such as block explorers.
• Measurement Date: Monthly, starting in August and ending in January. Rewards will be delivered on a monthly basis.

Strategic Rationale

1. Enables Developer-Led Growth: OS Dev Tooling is the foundation of the Superchain’s developer experience. Retro Funding ensures open source tools like libraries and debuggers remain well-maintained and composable.
2. Corrects a Clear Market Failure: These tools are essential to the ecosystem but lack direct monetization paths. Retro Funding solves this by rewarding impact retroactively, allowing builders to focus on utility instead of monetization.
3. Strengthens the Platform: Supporting OSS complements prevents vendor lock-in by closed source alternatives, compounds innovation, and reduces reliance on top-down grants—making the Superchain more open, resilient, and scalable.

---

[GoodCookie_ETH]

I am excited to see Uniswap Hook Builders getting a cutout! Thanks for putting this together!

[Mint]

In order to better promote cross-chain interop and liquidity aggregation within the Superchain ecosystem, the Mint team suggested that the Optimism Foundation could reach a strategic cooperation with the Uniswap Foundation:
Uniswap supports a group of L2 networks of Superchain members that contribute to the Superchain ecosystem, which can be arranged according to the contribution value of the sorter income, for example:
Mode Network
Mint Blockchain
BOB Network
Soneium

[Gonna.eth]

@system

Uniswap Hook Builders: Reward Uniswap hook builders for driving activity across the Superchain, and hooks that support interop. Part of the budget will be reserved for this category, and will be allocated based on the impact of participating hook builders.

One concern I’d like to raise is about the Uniswap Hook Builders category.

Uniswap is already spending aggressively to get the same few hooks built repeatedly. There’s a heavy redundancy here.

To build a hook today, you must be whitelisted by Uniswap to be supported by their router contract. Otherwise, your hook can’t be used through the standard interface, effectively allowing Uniswap to filter who is eligible for OP rewards.

This introduces subset bias, where Retro doesn’t reward open impact but instead aligns with ecosystems that control access.

It’ll be better if you treat “hook builders” as a modular track, but open that slot to future plugin ecosystems too, don’t hardcode Uniswap into the meta-incentive structure, and transform them into a gatekeeper.

Also, add mandatory co-incentives for projects of these hooks. This adds accountability, avoids gaming the rewards and aligns incentives with long-term Superchain growth.

[Jonas]

Thank you all for the thoughtful feedback on the proposed S8 Retro Funding scope.
Based on the strong community input around maintaining Retro Funding’s neutrality across applications, the Foundation has decided to remove the dedicated Uniswap Hook Builders budget from the proposed Onchain Builders Mission scope.

While we appreciate the intent behind highlighting novel interop use cases, it’s become clear that carving out budget for specific apps risks undermining the program’s neutrality and its focus on measuring impact.

Uniswap Hook Builders will still be eligible for Retro Funding: Onchain Builders and their impact will be measured like this of any other onchain builder.

The post has been updated to reflect this decision.

[system]

Please note the above Retro Funding Missions have been updated to include the budgets proposed by the Budget Board here.

The Foundation has also removed the OP Stack Dependency Mission for Season 8, based on internal discussions and continuous dialogue with the Budget Board.