S02 Committee Proposal: Decentralized Finance Governance Committee: Group A

Thanks for the link, I hadn’t seen that thread.

I think the concept that a dissenting committee member must explain their justification is generally a good feature.

However, I do think it might be more transparent and easier on the committee members and delegates if the committee recommendation comes with (i) case for, (ii) case against, (iii) committee majority recommendation, and (iv) disclosure of committee members that vote contrary to the majority.

If cases for and against are both presented and dissenting committee members disclose their dissent, I don’t personally think that a separate rundown or explanation of that delegates specific reasons for dissent need to be called out as justifications should be adequately represented in the case for and case against framework. It’s nuanced, but to me that still feels like a more united committee communication vs a dissenting voter being required to break from the group and write a separate thread.


I came here in hopes of making my own committee but just found out i cant. so i am here to provide feedback. you guys have a great team set up here with good relevant backgrounds.


i think nice for all time

1 Like

Check out my tread about the subject.

It would be cool if the committee can state plus and minuses, yin and yang about proposals without actually giving a direct recommendation. Let the delegates make their own perceptive with help of the committee’s in depth analysis.

Other DeFi committees are also good but I must choose the best one for the OP ecosystem so I will give a for to this committee, I know Katie Garci and Linda Xie well, read about others they also seen as qualified.

1 Like

Abstaining from this vote since this is my proposal.

Voted yes

In my opinion, this is the Defi committee with the most relevant and wide ranging experience.


Abstained as I have a defi committee proposal of my own.


Abstained from this vote since I’m part of the committee proposal.


Vote: Abstain

We are involved in this committee.

Note really sure how I should vote here. I am favoring abstaining at the moment as I already voted for another DeFi proposal (C). I don’t have anything against this proposal, and the members also seem capable but I guess I should only vote for 1 out of the 3 DeFi committees unless I misunderstood the process.

Hey @lefterisjp - thanks for your transparency.

We have been grateful for your contribution to OP thus far and would love to continue a similar commitment via this committee.

While I understand it may feel contradictory, the amendment to now include four total committees (vs. previously three), makes voting on multiple teams within different categories welcomed.

We have seen this with other large delegates (Olimpio, Polynya, etc.)

Hope this helps!

1 Like

Echoing what Fig said, from our understanding, it is acceptable to vote for 2 of the 3 DeFi committees if you wish.

Voted ‘For’.

  1. Committee is very active in the forum, voting, and organising the collective.
  2. Their combined voting power is high, and their career experience is very relevant & senior, and thus they should be having a say in these committees.

Okay then I will vote for 1 more other than C.

Voting: for.

Our entire rational is posted here.

I voted FOR this committee.

Very active voices and clear leaders in OP governance.

1 Like

snapshot vote - passed