Hey Vincent, The collective mirror account has some answers
The conclusions of RetroPGF 3 are not yet public but you can read about the scope here:
You can read how impact = profit was suggested. Every Badgeholder is allowed to use its own metric system.
From personal experience, I used lists to see what other badgeholders, that I trust, recommended. I didn’t use their allocations but I got exposed to many projects I didn’t know.
I’ve seen a list used to sort projects in categories, from good projects to bad projects and I believe there was a “vote 0” list I didn’t pay attention to.
You can learn more about Bdgeholder’s points of view by visiting this thread.
- Participation depends on that stage of the RetroPGF.
- The badgeholder nomination process was during September
- The Signup process was from Sept 21 to Oct 23
- The review process was from Oct 24 to Nov 1 (anyone could report any participant)
- The voting cycle was from Nov 2 to Dec 6.
- Now we are in feedback and reflection where OP Foundation gathers everyone’s opinion for the next RetroPGF cycle.
You can participate in every step.