[READY] [GF: Phase 1 Cycle 3 Proposal] Infinity Wallet

[OPUser]

Voted: Yes

Pros:

1. 80% of requested fund is either going to DApps dev on Op Chain or to project intergrating the wallet, we need more project/DApps integration, hence voted yes.

Cons:
Wallet market is crowded, apart from that I dont see any.

Now, I am requesting your feedback on these of my ideas. Feedback is two-way approach, you help us and we help you.

Proposal to stop Phase 0 Projects to submit new proposal in Phase 1

There were 20+ projects in Phase 0, some of them has a good plan to distribute the token while other does not. Here is an excellent summary by @MinimalGravitas . Phase 0 officially concluded yesterday and soon OP will distribute 36M token between Phase 0 projects. Announcement With this proposal, I want to share my idea and seeking your feedback on whether to allow Phase 0 projects to submit another funding proposal in phase 1 or not . In my opinion, as long as previous funds are not exhauste…

Accountability of Phase 0/1 Funds given to projects

That is a good question, and this is what I was thinking. For integration fund, one example will be Infinity Wallet proposal where 80% is going for dev and integration - Let’s say project A is giving some incentive to project B for their integration, in this case I think it would not be a problem to share their address as both are public application. For marketing and content creation (for example 80% Marketing proposal of Kromatika Proposal): - This depends on content creator(s), if they are …