Preliminary Curation for Pairwise Planets: Insight and Feedback Phase

Welcome to the preliminary phase of curation for the Pairwise Planets! This post serves as an early insight into the curation process, emphasizing the critical role of community feedback. Your insights are invaluable in shaping effective Pairwise Planets. Once the final curation is complete, we’ll share the definitive list of planets here, providing a three-day window for community feedback before they are integrated into the game.

In our review, certain applications stood out as ‘noisy,’ potentially skewing the clarity and focus of our Pairwise Planets. These were flagged based on a variety of criteria, most of which are outlined in the RetroPGF Round 3 Application Guidelines, and in detail on the Optimism Governance Forum. These include flags for issues such as advertising, spam, promises of future impact, insufficient information submitted, out of scope contributions, amongst others. We believe community insight is crucial in deciding their place in our ecosystem, so please indicate if there are concerns around currently flagged projects.

The script we’re utilizing for this curation process is designed to create categories that link projects with similar characteristics or ecosystem impacts. We start by populating and adjusting an initial list of categories based on the existing data set of applicants. The initial category list is then used to categorize project applications where they best fit. We are then able to manually adjust the categorization in a way that ensures all categories are the same size, within a couple of projects. By providing a suggested list of categories followed by a sorting of projects into the suggested categories, we ensure a systematic, objective approach to reviewing applications. The script’s detailed workings will be shared in a follow-up post, inviting community scrutiny and suggestions for refinement. If you are interested in exploring the code behind this script, the Github repository is here.

We are dedicating time until November 5th for community feedback. After that, we will submit the collections for Pairwise voting, as it will serve as an experiment for RetroPGF. During this period, we encourage you to review the preliminary list, reflect on the flagged applications, and provide your insights. Please discuss your feedback regarding the collections here. For projects flagged by the AI, refer to this existing post.

Stay tuned for the release of our final curation list, a cornerstone in the Pairwise Planets’ creation. This list, shaped by both our script and your feedback, will serve as the foundation for the diverse and dynamic worlds we’re building together.

Thank you for being a pivotal part of Pairwise Planets. Your voice shapes worlds. Dive in, share feedback, and together, let’s craft a universe unparalleled. Act now, and make a lasting impact.

4 Likes

We ran the script again; 300 applications have been flagged.

2 Likes

We’ve curated a list of categories for Pairwise based on your project submissions. Please review this doc and let us know if you’re satisfied with your project’s categorization. Feedback is essential. If you believe your project has been misplaced, please let us know. If you think it’s well-placed, we need that information too!

Categories:

  • Asset Management & Portfolio Tools
  • Data Analytics & Insights
  • Blockchain News & Media
  • Cross-Chain Interoperability
  • Governance Tools
  • DeFi (Decentralized Finance)
  • DAOs, ReFi & DAO Tooling
  • Exchanges, DEX, Trading & Liquidity
  • Developer Education & Mentoring
  • Explorers, Security & Node Deployment Tools
  • Developer Tools - Smart Contracts
  • Blockchain Developer Hub
  • Wallet & Wallet Tools
  • Gaming & Entertainment
  • NFTs, POAPs & Collectibles
  • Grants, Capital Allocation & Onboarding
  • Web3 Community Engagement
  • Web3 Education & Skill Development
  • Digital Identity & Social Privacy Innovations
  • Local Blockchain Communities
  • Community Building
  • Ethereum Infrastructure

You can signal your feedback here or reach out to Kris Jones. Your input is invaluable to us!

X: @KrisJ_official

Discord: theDAOjones

4 Likes

Watched the video and very impressed by the process. The fact that ChatGPT is able to validate the rules for proposal eligibility is exciting. If the execution of more subjective, high-level governance ideas like these are automatable in a credibly neutral way, governance just gets not just far more efficient, but (key for broad engagement) fun :slight_smile:

1 Like

Having the Impact evaluation framework published I wonder if the AI can do a second round and score proposals by impact.

3 Likes

EthernautDAO went to " DAOs, ReFi & DAO Tooling" but is 95% “Developer Education & Mentoring” 5% “Blockchain Developer Hub”

2 Likes

This is helpful feedback, thanks!

Hey @Gonna.eth we can not do it for this round we did alot of manual work on top of the AI categorization to have more even categories. And we are on deliver time RetroPGF starts so soon!! We are so exited that the community experiment list creation with Pairwise and all the feedback to make v2 even better. For EthernautDAO we reclasify it the new sheet should come any time soon with individuals included!

We deeply value your insights and encourage you to keep the conversation going.

4 Likes

We’re back with the updated curated a list of categories for Pairwise for both Project and Indivudual submissions. Please review this doc and let us know if you’re satisfied with your Individual application or project’s categorization. Your feedback is essential.

If you believe your project has been misplaced, please let us know. If you think it’s well-placed, we need that information too!

Individual Categories: NEW!

  • Blockchain Education
  • Community Building
  • Content Creation & Media
  • Development & Infrastructure
  • Governance Tokenomics and Analytics
  • International & Multilingual Support
  • NFTs
  • Security & Cross-Chain Solutions
  • User Experience & Adoption

Project Categories:

  • Asset Management & Portfolio Tools
  • Data Analytics & Insights
  • Blockchain News & Media
  • Cross-Chain Interoperability
  • Governance Tools
  • DeFi (Decentralized Finance)
  • DAOs, ReFi & DAO Tooling
  • Exchanges, DEX, Trading & Liquidity
  • Developer Education & Mentoring
  • Explorers, Security & Node Deployment Tools
  • Developer Tools - Smart Contracts
  • Blockchain Developer Hub
  • Wallet & Wallet Tools
  • Gaming & Entertainment
  • NFTs, POAPs & Collectibles
  • Grants, Capital Allocation & Onboarding
  • Web3 Community Engagement
  • Web3 Education & Skill Development
  • Digital Identity & Social Privacy Innovations
  • Local Blockchain Communities
  • Community Building
  • Ethereum Infrastructure

Again, for feedback on any of the categorizations, you can add your feedback here on the governance forum or reach out to me. Feedback ensures we are classifying projects where they would be expected, and helps us achieve a smoother overall experience for users.

X: @KrisJ_official

Discord: theDAOjones

3 Likes