So @optimismFND gave 900k $OP to unverified #delegator’s application with a never created wallet, and @PikaProtocol did #rugpull on.
Developer @EthanDev6 ENS-address never existed, yet in August 2022 Pika Protocol received 900,000 $OP tokens as part of the OptimismDAO’s governance funding program.
So what @optimismFND did about this? Really they never checked dev’s existence, yet gave 900k token?
Delegate: Delegate Commitments [OLD] - #186 by ethan0
Proposal: [GF: Phase 0 Proposal] Pika Protocol
OP Rewards: OP Rewards Impact Analysis: Pika Protocol
Yet #PikaProtocol generously explaining their #rug on social media, while protocols v4 trap is still pinned. #L2’s are racing for adoption, but those who do not protect its #userbase will loose in the long run for sure.
We need more @zachxbt alike peoples within protocols, and more transparent protocol approach about those issues. Lectures need to be taken, and announced!
Possible related users:
ps. this was a tweet in first place, don’t want to put more time since I already cannot take my funds from v3 and feeling the rug pain. I really wanted to see a protocol that cares about those issues. You can name me QQ, that’s ok. Just wanted to put my tweet into more visible scene for future conversation.