RPGF Round 1. (FAQ & General info)
Now that voting is around the corner and discovery UI is live, I want to start the conversation with my initial thoughts.
With my limited knowledge on public good, there are couple of nomination I would not consider a public good.
- A protocol having raised millions in VC/token(sales) funding
- Very less impact or at least at early stage
- Could be considered as a public good in the past but not anymore
My Focus would be -
- Clear and visible impact (one example would be revoke Ui), NiceNode, Orbiter could be another one (there are couple of open question though). Optimism Español , jackxbt and similar under education section.
- Must be open sourced
- Might consider means-test where needed.
This is not to bash anyone or any project. To me, Optimism two pillar gov model was the main motivation behind joining this collective. Finally, we are moving away from plutocratic voting system and I understand that my vote has equal weightage, like other elected citizen, and I want to be transparent as possible, provide my rational behind every decision, take feedback, iterate and work towards making this collective better.
So, if you have any feedback, please let me know. (comment /dm on this forum or on discord nono#1218)
Note -
Please note that I am not a smart contract developer and may reach out to collective I trust for additional information or may have to skip certain nominations related to development tools, APIs, or packages when casting my vote. Moreover, the guidelines provided by the Optimism Foundation may result in significant changes to the criteria outlined above.