Did you notice there is also a bit of a monopoly on the way that the tokens are being delegated as well ???
It is highly unfair in which the airdrop #2 was sent out without having a proper dashboard for discovery of new delegates…
What is a bigger concern to you ?
When or how many of the tokens get sent out?
Or who ends up in power due to a broken system?
This is not looking good for the Optimism governance.
It seems that private investment firms have moved into the ecosystem in the form of decentralized enterprises and are currently claiming their stake in decisions being made through Optimism governance.
Controlling the monetary policies that you speak about and leaving the tokens house community or other delegates powerless when it comes to decisions or grant approval.
Ignoring the concerns of new members who don’t have any voting rights due to a rigged system of token delegation!