I think the following quote from Law of Chains v0.1: Section-by-Section Overview answers the question to an extent. If the Law of Chains is intended to be enforced solely through resolutions of Optimism Governance, then it’s probably up to the “challenger” to make their point on why they believe something is past the threshold of reasonable, as supported by the Law of Chains and the Optimism Constitution.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Law of Chains v0.1: Section-by-Section Overview
|
1 | 4200 | July 25, 2023 | |
25th OP Community Call **LAW OF CHAINS EDITION** will be [Tuesday August 1st @ 10am PT / 1pm ET / 7pm CET] | 2 | 990 | August 2, 2023 | |
Ratification: Law of Chains | 5 | 2816 | November 15, 2023 | |
[FINAL] Superchain Governance Deep Dive | 37 | 5838 | October 4, 2023 | |
Accelerated Decentralization Proposal For Optimism
|
35 | 2370 | October 16, 2024 |