I think the following quote from Law of Chains v0.1: Section-by-Section Overview answers the question to an extent. If the Law of Chains is intended to be enforced solely through resolutions of Optimism Governance, then it’s probably up to the “challenger” to make their point on why they believe something is past the threshold of reasonable, as supported by the Law of Chains and the Optimism Constitution.
Related Topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Upgrade Proposal #6: Multi-Chain Prep (MCP) L1 | 11 | 3442 | March 12, 2024 | |
[GF: Phase 0 Proposal] Chainlink | 6 | 3439 | January 27, 2023 | |
Upgrade Proposal #4 | 24 | 3672 | February 14, 2024 | |
OP Bulletin: Blobptimism, protocol upgrades and more, March 7th 📰
|
2 | 648 | March 11, 2024 | |
[READY][GF: Phase 1 Proposal] 0xHabitat | 12 | 3766 | September 13, 2022 |