Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops

402

First of all, I agree with cobie’s point（https://gov.optimism.io/t/extended-ineligibility-for-future-airdrops/2249/58） of view

  1. op is a token that can be circulated. Good liquidity is needed in the secondary market. A market without liquidity would be catastrophic for op. Good liquidity comes from a lot of buying and a lot of selling. So there must be sellers.
  2. The people we should punish are the ones who go through the contract to claim the airdrop (wallet address). Their actions are causing panic in the community.
  3. The team should not be overly concerned about the price of op. It should focus on the governance of the op system.
  4. op governance is still in the early days. The team’s view is crucial to op development The team should be careful what they say.
  5. the size of the op airdrop is unprecedented. more than 200,000 wallet addresses, but this is does not mean that there are 200,000 or so real people, right? It’s too normal for each person to have a few wallet addresses. Although let’s do a witch exclusion. But only a portion of the exclusion.
  6. what the op community needs is dynamic growth. There are new people entering the op ecosystem and old people exiting the op ecosystem. As long as the amount of entry is greater than the amount of exit, it proves that the op ecosystem is growing, right?
4 Likes