Depending on how ‘friendly’ the nominees are in the Builders & Growth Councils, they’ve effectively taken control of both sub-committees of the Grants Councils, and thus taken control of the Governance Fund allocations in their current state.
- Their Builders council sub-committee votes occupy the current Top 3 positions.
- Their Growth Experiments council sub-committee votes occupy a controlling 4 of the Top 5 positions.
A real shame.
I know there are other projects that limit the maximum voting power of their delegates. Perhaps this is an option we could have a one-person, one-vote election on?