Hello @0xDonPepe
Thank you for your prompt and frank response.
In line with you in the paths to consolidate a solid reputation, I focus for now on the systemic perspective for the collective.
Although I understand why voting power is essential if we seek to avoid capture (through the token house voting), I wonder if the ACC membership should include other stakeholders by design.
Or is there a reason for this decision, in the membership of the ACC?
I also wonder if anybody could share if there is a remuneration of OPs for delegates who are active, but who are not within the top 100. And how the % are decided in proportion to other tiers.
Beyond the possibility of adding ‘more active delegates’ as a filter to the @Agora platform ,
I wonder if it would be positive for the ACC to consider more the active participation (and the agile response capacity) of the member delegates, and not just voting power.
Just curious to know more, to understand the process you guys have had.
Hey @op_julian, do you know when this snapshot was taken? I think I might also qualify for the ACC.
Also, about the first requirement for membership:
Members must be an individual or professional delegate and not a representative of a protocol or corporation.
I noticed that at least three delegates are representatives of protocols/corporations. Is this initial criterion overridden by another, or what’s the situation here?
Sorry about to confusing, on Dune dashboard, my address is not tagged as my forum name. could you please update the records on your side, thats my address and unfortunetly I missed the tag.
I will update this! I would also recommend if it’s not too inconvenient to you to unify your name across platforms so that we can locate you easier in the future.
,