RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread

Retro Funding 🔴
109

I haven’t commented on RPGF #3 thus far because my thoughts have not changed from previous feedback and comments on the matter. But just to reiterate:

  1. Citizen House needs to vote in specific, objective qualifying criteria. Not important to get every project - more important to capture most valuable projects with minimizing overhead for badgeholders.
  2. Citizen House needs to be greatly expanded. As to how - that’s a matter for another topic.
    2b) Token House should have a proposal type for vetoing specific RPGF recipients, as well as removing specific badgeholders.
  3. I’d like to see all OP allocated towards RPGF be burned.
  4. RPGF will instead be awarded through a share of sequencer revenues.
7 Likes