Hey team,
The upgrades to RetroPGF 3 are seriously impressive and very valuable to the ecosystem!
The “Lists” concept is gold. Badgeholders can now effectively pool their expertise, saving time and making more informed decisions.
I want to specially highlight the the voting process and IU. The new integrated voting application simplifies the process for badgeholders, aamazing!
Questions for the Team
-
Will there be a filter for low-quality projects/scams/lies?
- Having a mechanism to weed out scams or low-quality projects would add even more integrity to the RetroPGF.
-
How can Token Mission proposals participate in RPGF?
- I’m curious if they are eligible for their work, or these projects cannot apply for this work?
Suggested Improvement
One last point: Effective Communication between projects and badgeholders is key. Whether it’s a dedicated chat room or a Q&A session, an easy and transparent way for everyone to communicate would be highly beneficial.
I love this updates!
Diego,