Hey everyone, Juan here, from Kleros.
I was thinking about how we could help with the problem addressed by @Michael regarding the importance of aligning incentives across all participants in the Retro PGF submission process (OP foundation employees, Badge holders, OP community, and submitters).
I wrote a first draft of the curation system I was thinking about (note that is a first version of the idea, so all guidelines and parameters might need adjustments).
Also, I deployed yesterday the List mentioned simulating a Retro PGF 4 curated list on Goerli so you can see how it would look like (eventually we could also create a frontend for OP Retro PGF).
Everyone can take a look at it here and can upload/challenge a project using Goerli Eth (let me know if you require some).
I think it’s important to outline that the list could be created with any parameter;
For example, if you want to make it extremely flexible with the only objective of avoiding spam or scammy projects. (meaning that all other projects non-scammy/spam, even with a minor contribution could enter the list). After that, the badge holders will analyze the submissions, but without scammy/spam projects (and hopefully, without needing the intervention of the OP foundation resources)
Please, Let me know your thoughts and feedback, or any questions you might have.