[READY] [GF: Phase 1 Proposal] dForce

[OPUser]

Voted: Yes

Pros:

1. Number of token asked is reasonable.
2. 50% token is going to marketing and builders which is aligned to Optimistic approach.
3. Token distribution time frame is good (6-24 months)

Sure. dForce community has demonstrated a strong interest and support to L2 expansion, with Optimism standing in the front rank. We believe we are able to match it 1:1 upon OP approval.

I am assuming here, you will be machining the incentives 1:1

Cons:

1. 50% for liquidity mining is too much.

Now, I am requesting your feedback on these of my ideas. Feedback is two-way approach, you help us and we help you.

Proposal to stop Phase 0 Projects to submit new proposal in Phase 1

There were 20+ projects in Phase 0, some of them has a good plan to distribute the token while other does not. Here is an excellent summary by @MinimalGravitas . Phase 0 officially concluded yesterday and soon OP will distribute 36M token between Phase 0 projects. Announcement With this proposal, I want to share my idea and seeking your feedback on whether to allow Phase 0 projects to submit another funding proposal in phase 1 or not . In my opinion, as long as previous funds are not exhauste…

Accountability of Phase 0/1 Funds given to projects

That is a good question, and this is what I was thinking. For integration fund, one example will be Infinity Wallet proposal where 80% is going for dev and integration - Let’s say project A is giving some incentive to project B for their integration, in this case I think it would not be a problem to share their address as both are public application. For marketing and content creation (for example 80% Marketing proposal of Kromatika Proposal): - This depends on content creator(s), if they are …