Proposal to pause Governance Fund voting cycles till minimum viable decentralization is achieved

This is the third time you are raising this concern and i get the lack of engagement on your suggestion.

I remember reading somewhere between this line
“those who are not trying to fix the fault are the one gaining most from the said fault”

What you are saying is true and in current form we do have problem that need to be fixed. Central block producer and no fraud proof is common concern i hear when i look beyond our gov echo chamber.

users not willing to move their fund from main net because of this and I cant prove this, consider this as just me intuition, whales and organizations are also waiting for these issue to be fixed before moving their funds over. Or may be those moving millions will simply stay on main net as they wont mind paying gas fee for the security of the L1.

We have a twitter space coming Monday on Bedrock, lets see if we get some time line on when it will be live.

So far we have distributed over 50M OP token which should run through Q1 23 like you have said and we can easily pause the fund distribution until then.


others might suggest, lets not pause but look at proposal individually which I dont agree with. If we continue to accept the proposal, I cant Vote No just because there is no fraud proof, its not their responsibility to implement it, then only option left for me is to Abstain.


Lets focus on OP Citizen house and complete at least one round of RPGF in next few months and we can resume gov fund early next year.


I am small delegate and voting against or far has very little impact on final decision, but just putting my thoughts here and supporting this proposal.

11 Likes