Promoting Transparency and Accountability by making RetroPGF Badgeholder Votes Public

I would like to bring forth a proposal that can significantly enhance the RetroPGF allocation process. By making badgeholder votes public, we can introduce a new level of transparency, accountability, and fairness to our governance system, while mitigating potential issues such as cronyism and collusion.

Many public greats are creating frameworks to measure grantee impact, we should provide them with the necessary data to evaluate the most successful badgeholders based on their allocation of grants. The availability of badgeholder votes for impact analysis can act as a catalyst for innovation in grantee accountability. As we work towards improving reporting mechanisms and measuring impact, understanding the reasoning behind grant allocations becomes crucial. By analyzing the voting patterns of badgeholders who consistently support successful and impactful projects, we can identify best practices and learn from their decision-making strategies. This knowledge-sharing allows us to refine our grant allocation methodologies and optimize the impact of our funding.

It is worth noting that the public disclosure of badgeholder votes should be conducted in a manner that protects privacy and sensitive information. The focus should primarily be on the voting outcomes and their correlation with the achieved impact. By maintaining this balance, we can ensure transparency without compromising the privacy of individuals involved in the decision-making process.

Transparency is the bedrock of a thriving decentralized ecosystem, and it empowers the community by providing visibility into decision-making processes. Currently, badgeholder votes remain undisclosed, limiting the ability to assess the impact of their choices and identify the most impactful badgeholders. By making these votes public, we can unlock numerous benefits for the Optimism Collective and Ethereum network.

Firstly, public disclosure of badgeholder votes ensures transparency in the grant allocation process. It allows all stakeholders to scrutinize the decision-making and understand how grants are distributed based on their merits. Transparency fosters trust within our community, which is vital for the sustainable growth of Optimism and Ethereum as a whole.

Secondly, making badgeholder votes public fosters accountability. When votes are in the public domain, badgeholders are more likely to approach their role with a heightened sense of responsibility. They will be aware that their decisions are subject to scrutiny by the community, encouraging them to make informed choices that prioritize the long-term success of projects and the ecosystem.

Public availability of badgeholder votes enables the evaluation of their performance. By assessing the impact resulting from their votes, we can identify badgeholders who consistently make impactful decisions and contribute significantly to the success of projects. Recognizing and rewarding their achievements will motivate other badgeholders to actively participate and make well-informed choices, further strengthening the governance process.

Public disclosure of votes can address concerns related to cronyism and collusion. By making the voting outcomes transparent, it becomes more challenging for badgeholders with personal interests or close affiliations to manipulate the grant allocation process. Public evaluation acts as a deterrent against biased decisions, ensuring that grants are allocated fairly and impartially to deserving projects.

By advocating for the public disclosure of badgeholder votes, we strive to close the gap between grant allocation and impact analysis. Embracing transparency and accountability in our decision-making processes will empower us to make more informed choices, foster community engagement, and advance the cause of grantee accountability for the collective.

Public badgeholder votes provide invaluable learning opportunities for the community. By studying their decision-making process and the factors considered, individuals and projects can gain insights and make more informed choices in the future. This knowledge sharing contributes to a more engaged and knowledgeable community, driving the progress of Optimism and Ethereum.

Let’s continue building a governance system that not only allocates funds effectively but also takes responsibility for the impact achieved by grantee projects. Through collective effort and transparent decision-making, we can catalyze a floeresching collective and contribute to the growth and success of Ethereum as a whole.


This is really good idea and what we need. I want to support this.

Good work mate! I liked it! Keep on working

I have a lot to think about this Carlos. This is something that it’s necessary, because the way that we allocate sometimes it’s more humanized than rationale.
With this in mind, nature thinking of humans are more likely to decide to their own homes or people, and not to the benefit of the whole ecosystem. Now we can asume that code it’s not law because they are committed by humans, but if we fought human hearts and make them code inside the evolution of the tacit knowledge and let us know the reasons why a vote it’s emitted.

1 Like