Special Voting Cycle 9a
Voted in Favor :-
- easy to reach consensus when group size is small
- communication could be fast tracked, this was a challenge in season 2
- Streamline the process, making grant funding less complex
I also believe that putting decision power is few entities could lead to centralization of power and might create an Eco-chamber which will hurt us in long run.
But supporting this proposal because OF is working on iteration, feedback from past season is reflected in this proposal and we are more aligned toward experiment from beginning.
Voted : Against
Governance is difficult, chaotic co-ordination could be tiresome some time, few entities will try to make it political or even worse, a pvp battle. But even after all this, we should try to be more inclusive, inclusive of other protocol, builders and community.
I am reading “skin-in-the-game” narrative as a positive side of this proposal which I agree but what about other protocol bringing more value to our chain even if they are not native ? What do we want to built, a cult or a community ?
I shared the similar thought here and also agree with @BP_Gamma here