we’re heavily invested in the future of OP given we are not deploying multi-chain and have gone all in on OP
Yes, and I thank you for that and you also get heavy reward for that so its win-win situation.
With this we’d like to see OP tokens utilised to grow the entire chain and ecosystem.
Believe me you when I say this, I am not involved with OP and any project on OP what so ever and still investing my time and energy here, you know why,its because I want to see the success of OP too, so we are on the same page here.
We’d like to be able to maintain our voice going forward
Sure, I want that too but I am questioning your approach. You are a delegate like me and others here so you must follow the same approach, users will decide where they want to put their faith, if they choose you I am fine with that but at least give them a chance.
You got those token not because you were able to create the traction for your project alone,is it ? All those TVL and addresses belongs to small users like me and not giving us a fair chance to raise our voice is wrong.
I have just 140K votes assigned to me, do I have a place to raise my voice with that, Yes.
Word you are looking for is “dominance”, you want to maintain your dominance in DAO gov and you choose the different approach, short one and wrong one.
Monitoring and enforcement is extremely hard and it’s extremely easy for bad actors to bypass this
Yes, this might happen but if you dilute the token first as per your proposal plan, there are chance that we will hear more than 1 person voice. Other users might delegate to themselves or they will choose someone else.
I would like to see more participation and more decentralized voting power, top 1% dominating the DAO will lead us to three steps back, decision will be biased and it will lead to lack of motivation and confidence in DAO gov.
You’re creating a second class of tokens and effectively signalling that OP projects should not participate in governance
I never said that and that is/will never be my motivation, you are a delegate which means you have a voice in the DAO, I know for fact that other OP protects are also part of Delegates and on top of that, anyone can create a profile and advertise to get the voting power.
Why should we give your special route ? That is my concern.
If it’s a major concern we are happy to abstain from future votes until Phase 1 distributions to projects are completed.
I guess, my main concern is not clear yet, I am fine if you hold 20M or even 100M voting power, once that happen I will look for another DAO to waste my time and energy. Concern is your approach, dilute the token first as per your distributions plan and let user decide where they want to put their faith or buy the token from open market.
That is my concern, abstaining will not fix this.