There are few valid points in this proposal, amount of delegated $OP going down is a concern and need broader discussion.
But I would vote against this proposal.
Protocols and veVELO holders have a strong alignment to Optimism’s success
Disagree here, protocol building on Optimism have a strong alignment and Foundation is already giving voting power to them.
Perhaps foundation could run an event like Uniswap did and delegate token or we can take approach similar to Starknet.
I am skeptical that, this proposal is focused towards boosting and speculating project native token(point 2 and 4) and second, team could only choose to delegate the token agreeing with their view of optimism vision.
We should not priorities, discriminate or reward users on how they choose to interact with a specific project native token.