Jumping in here since I saw my name was mentioned a few times 
Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude for the consideration given to me, and I feel honored to see my name brought up. It is true that I dedicated significant time and effort outside of my usual responsibilities to implement EIP4844 on Prysm between February 2022 and November 2022. However, I was fortunate to work alongside an exceptional team at Prysm who ensured the smooth running of our operations. Without my teammates’ support, I would not have been able to undertake EIP4844 as a side project and would have had to divide my attention elsewhere. While I completed the initial versions of EIP4844 on Prysm, it should be noted that my colleagues are also engaged in valuable work. I believe this proposal has the potential to create an impression of asymmetry and unfairness towards others and could undermine our credibility as a neutral party. I would like to clarify that I have sent a response to the Retroactive Public Goods Funding via email, which outlines my thoughts on this matter.
