[DRAFT] S02 Committee Proposal: Tooling Governance Committee

[Prometheus]

This is not true…

@MoneyManDoug

These committees are meant to have people in them who are strictly specialized in specific areas

I don’t know how many times I need to quote the original post but please don’t make me spam the forum.

@ben-chain

1. Information Overload for Delegates

There are currently a lot of proposals to be voted on by Token House delegates. Even for delegates that are very familiar with the context of these proposals and their applications, processing all these proposals is unsustainable. Providing feedback on proposal drafts and engaging on forum posts, while voting on active proposals, is currently an unmanageable workload for many delegates.

2. Purpose Mismatch for Delegates

Delegates have different areas of specialty. While the majority of proposals to date have been related to DeFi, some delegates specialize in non-DeFi related topics such as public goods, tooling, and L2 infrastructure. These delegates don’t feel well-equipped to vote on DeFi proposals or aren’t interested in doing so.