I agree on this statement. But at the same time some of this huge delegates don’t have the time to catch up with the forum. What they can do is trust some of their voting power to delegates of their choosing and create a more diverse community and point of view.
At the same time watching 5 to 7 delegates on snapshot “whaling” their votes to approve proposals or seeing someone on the top 10 badgeholders with 3.9M votes where 65% of the votes are given by himself it’s not that apealing for a decentralized advocate community.
As I said this is a post to tinker with the idea, not a formal proposal, I would love to read a strong case against it to understand why am I wrong.