Hi there! 
First of all @v3naru_Curia, I celebrate this initiative as I see a lot of potential in “ensuring that constructive participation is recognized”. 
I broadly agree with this statement. And I think it reveals a more fundamental question:
what quantitative metric helps us to best measure the value provided, even if it is qualitative?
Speaking of Metrics & Weights, I have a couple of triggering questions:
- I see that more weight is given to the ’ Proposal Initiations’ than to the Proposal Discussions of a previously created one. I assume that this is because creating a proposal is difficult (if you are looking for a certain viability of being approved) but… won’t this encourage fragmentation in the forum (everyone trying to be the initiator)? What if it were required that the proposal has been accepted for it to be counted?
- I see you are starting to use the forum to verify users (with the ’ Public Forum to Wallet Link Verification’), could this not be misinterpreted in the Forum Score as a hot topic on the forum? I mean, how to differentiate automated and/or technical posts from quality comments?
Anyway, curious to see a first version of this to identify more angles.
May the force be with you.
