Wallets that held $OP 'and' accumulated more 'and' still holding should receiver a bigger airdrop of drop #2

[Ben]

Wallets that held $OP from the drop AND accumulated more at any point in time AND still holding those helps to keep $OP strong and should be rewarded additionally in the next drop.
This is similar to a discussion already but includes additional criteria and doesn’t exclude those that sold. It just rewards more to those that hold. e.g. @Moonbirds nesting, or BAYC/BAMC holders etc.

[0xjason42069]

What about people who sold half for eth or Usdc to LP ? Or people who deposited OP into Beethoven X ? Are they excluded because they “sold” ? I would not support this we cannot tell people what to do with there OP tokens lol it literally goes against what optimism stands for….no one should receive more just for holding…holding OP doesn’t help the optimistic ecosystem… using OP voting and participating in OP defi and ecosystem should be rewarded

[Ovetta]

I’ve seen this sentiment a lot here; “ Wallets that held $OP from the drop AND accumulated more at any point in time AND still holding those helps to keep $OP strong and should be rewarded additionally in the next drop.”

However I’ve bought $OP and hold it on the exchange (Coinbase). How would this kind of positive participation be counted or recognized?

[Leuno]

This is counter productive. OP needs liquidity which means that selling & buying is a necessity. At some point the Optimism Foundation will dissolve & we the collective will have to hire market makers. Staking Optimism in order to operate a node provides utility, hands off the baton to the collective, and decentralizes the network making it far harder for centralized powers to shut down or censor the protocol.

Node Operators is an excellent use case for Optimism Coin

To fully decentralize the Optimism Network token holders should be able to run nodes and stake their Optimisms in order to demonstrate their commitment to maintaining the node. It is up to the community if their should be a mandatory minimum stake in order to be a node operator or if the node operator can just stake what they wish. If there is no minimum stake then would those with lower stake have to earn the trust of the network before processing transaction on the regular. What consequences …

[Sergey]

people could sold OP after airdrop but later they can buy it again! So, the main question is to take a snapshot and to see who has op at the moment - these people are eligible for more amount of airdrop.

[G.GHANDI]

Proposal to counter 0xJohn op initial claims

Interesting dilema, worth a debate for sure. For me it should not be about punishing people that use their free will to sell their airdrop, but more about incentivising hodl’ers and stakers that support the network by not dumping, I’m sure this will be calculated into future airdrops. I’m personally not planning on selling anything. an investment in the future

My view exactly….

[Sergey]

The team should think about the people who invest extra money to the project, for example buy more OP tokens or buy extra ETH and put both ETH/OP to the pool!

[Kingone]

This in essence is saying, reward additionally tokens to whales for not selling.

[Neodim]

It is necessary to stimulate interesting projects. New ideas for society may be more interesting than just storing capital. Storage devalues capital.