- There is no change in support of public goods. While we’ve updated the brand and changed the shorthand for Retroactive Public Goods Funding from “RetroPGF” to “Retro Funding,” there has not been a change in commitment to supporting public goods. The refreshed branding has no impact on the inclusion of public goods within scope. If the scope were changed to exclude public goods, governance input and approval would have been requested.
This statement makes no sense to me. It’s contradicting what the original post is saying.
The fact you rebranded RPGF to RF alone and threw so many projects under the bus speaks volumes on the intentions.
On the rest of the points … I know the foundation is trying to listen to feedback.
Then please listen to this. Stop deciding everything. This is supposed to be a DAO? Then let it become one.
We have been waiting years for this to happen and were patient. This rebranding away from public goods is the straw that broke the camel’s back for me.
I know the foundation has good intentions. I don’t think you mean bad in any of the things you do. I truly don’t.
So please if you listen to anything from me, listen to this.
Step away and let Optimism become a real DAO.
And this goes for everything. From RPGF, to token house, citizen house governance. Everything.
I think your voice is very much needed here.
You can’t imagine what it means to me coming from you @joanbp. Thank you.
I personally have had enough. When I repeat myself more than a number of times on a few things and see no change I then choose to spend my time better elsewhere.
Optimism is lucky to have you, Brichis and all the other awesome people. Knock some sense into them and build this into the awesome system it can become.
There is so much potential here. Don’t let this energy go to waste.