Its is my understanding that Citizens were not looped into discussing or decisions on round design, timelines and scope. While it is understandable to gradually decentralize and so on, and Citizen’s main feedback about workload was heard, I think it would have been useful to have their input heard along this design process.
Specially taking into account this Retro Funding will apply for the rest of 2024.
Especially curious to learn more of the specifics on the selection of public jurors: will they be sorted into groups by expertise and then randomly sampled?
Would also like to echo this, if not as a badgeholder as part of the Collective Feedback Commission.