The Future of Optimism Governance

[jengajojo]

Thank you for sharing @bobby

I’m happy that this post clearly outlines responsibilities of both houses and identifies clear scope for governance. I’m excited for what Season 5 and 6 have to bring

• Does the scope of DAO subcommittees fall under resource allocation?
• Many have expressed interest in contributing to the RPGF scope, metrics or evaluations discussion:

A review of RPGF2 and ideas for how data can improve future iterations

My team at Protocol Labs has been doing some analysis on the impact of funding open source. Eventually, we’d like to get to the point where you can take a funding pool like RPGF2 and evaluate its impact on network adoption indicators like active developers and monthly active users - and use those learnings to improve the next round. Here is a write-up on RPGF2 and a tweet thread you can check out. A few of the insights: 66/195 were ideal for permissionless impact measurement because they sh…

Building a Verifiable RetroPGF

Hey everyone, Ismael from Lagrange Labs here. I wanted to share a design that our team put together for a verifiable and trust-minimized RetroPGF reward distribution flow. We’d love any feedback from the OP Collective and OP Delegates! Our team is committed to support with making this a reality, if the Collective feels that this direction makes sense long-term. Introduction The Optimism Collective’s Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RetroPGF) provides a powerful mechanism to incentivize the c…

Is there room in the RPGF governance to receive input from the token house and modify its parameters?